
#11 QB · Minnesota Vikings
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'5"
Weight
237 lbs
Age
33
College
North Dakota State
Draft
2016, Rd 1, #2
Experience
10 yrs
QB Rank
#30 / 107
Grade Carson Wentz
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Carson Wentz grades out as a strong QB for Minnesota Vikings (B- Performance). That places him 30th of 107 graded quarterbacks. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 10+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 103 | 23,626 | 159 | 72 | 89.1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 1,216 | 6 | 5 | 85.8 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 3 | 118 | 0 | 0 | 80.6 |
Guaranteed
$2.6M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
Net of age, position, and term, Carson Wentz's deal earns a C+ Contract Value Index. At $3M AAV, this is a floor-price veteran contract that acknowledges Wentz's streaky injury history and inconsistent recent performance while providing organizational flexibility—the one-year structure signals Minnesota is treating this as a contingency play, not a long-term commitment. Through five games in 2025, Wentz has logged limited action, which aligns with the backup role the organization envisions for him alongside McCarthy and Murray in what media frames as a cautiously optimistic but ultimately depth-focused QB room. An established veteran now in his tenth season since being drafted second overall in 2016, Wentz is well past his developmental window; at 33, he represents a known commodity rather than an upside play, and the Contract Value Index reflects that reality—you're buying veteran floor-level insurance, not banking on a resurgence. The Vikings' recent activity, which centers on depth signings at receiver and linebacker positions, reinforces that Minnesota is building around unproven young talent rather than leaning on Wentz as a core piece, consistent with the media framing of him as capable emergency-starter insurance. This deal works for both sides: Wentz gets a final roster spot with a team he knows, and Minnesota gets a replacement-level-capable veteran who won't cripple the cap while McCarthy or Mullens develop—which is exactly the modest value proposition a C+ Contract Value Index grade reflects.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Carson's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Carson Wentz, a 10-year veteran and former first-round prospect, enters his third season with Minnesota in a backup-to-serviceable role after 103 career starts. Currently grading as a B-minus overall, Wentz represents a classic journeyman arc—once a promising talent whose ceiling has gradually narrowed through injury and inconsistency. He remains a reliable depth option and occasional starter, though his trajectory suggests he's unlikely to reclaim early-career form. This season, Wentz's passer rating of 80.2 sits marginally below the NFL average of 87.79, reflecting a career-long pattern of volatility that separates him from elite tier quarterbacks. His completion percentage of 62.3% nearly matches league average, while his yards-per-attempt of 6.36 trails the 6.73 benchmark, indicating less explosive downfield play than contemporaries. The concerning element is consistency: three consecutive C-minus grades from 2023 through 2025 underscore a plateau rather than a dip, suggesting this is who Wentz is at this stage rather than temporary underperformance. Wentz's body of work—89.1 career passer rating and 62.8% completion across his decade—remains materially stronger than his current season snapshot, which matters for context. However, declining rushing production (10.8 yards per game versus 12.31 average) and diminishing mobility compound questions about age-related decline. Moving forward, Wentz should be viewed as a reliable veteran bridge or emergency starter whose window for meaningful improvement has largely closed.
Carson Wentz ranks 30th of 107 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Carson between Geno Smith (B-) just ahead and Andy Dalton (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Geno SmithNew York JetsB-Justin FieldsKansas City ChiefsB-Jaxson DartNew York GiantsB-Graded lower
Andy DaltonPhiladelphia EaglesWentz returns to Minnesota as a depth piece in a crowded QB room. Multiple outlets frame this as a cautious re-addition with limited expectations. The one-year deal signals Minnesota views him as a low-commitment backup option. Fans question why the Vikings need three QBs and doubt Wentz's ability to contribute meaningfully. Success depends on McCarthy's development and whether Wentz stays healthy enough to provide emergency depth.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Carson Wentz is a veteran in his 10th NFL season listed at QB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Carson Wentz, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance B-, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 2 | 163 | 2 | 1 | 99.8 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 8 | 1,755 | 11 | 9 | 80.2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 3,563 | 27 | 7 | 94.6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 12 | 2,620 | 16 | 15 | 47.9 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 4,039 | 27 | 7 | 52.1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 11 | 3,074 | 21 | 7 | 56.3 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 13 | 3,296 | 33 | 7 | 56.3 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 3,782 | 16 | 14 | 52.1 |
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.