
#2 QB · Washington Commanders
Height
6'4"
Weight
231 lbs
Age
33
College
Louisiana Tech
Draft
2016, Rd 6, #207
Experience
8 yrs
Grade Jeff Driskel
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the books, the Contract Value Index reads C+, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 23 | 2,394 | 16 | 10 | 79.4 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 | 166 | 2 | 2 | 63.9 |
Length
1 year
AAV
$795K/yr
The C+ Contract Value Index on Jeff Driskel's deal stems from how the cap hit lines up against on-field output. At $795K AAV on a one-year contract, Washington is paying a depth-chart rate for a journeyman backup with a 79.4 career passer rating—the kind of serviceable-but-limited profile that warrants emergency insurance, not starter money. For a 33-year-old in his seventh season, a sub-$1M, one-year deal is appropriate and carries no dead-cap risk; the Commanders are buying short-term depth without overcommitting. The real value question is whether this price tag reflects what Driskel actually provides: limited-starter or third-string stability rather than a credible contingency who elevates the room. Given his journeyman resume, the minimal cap outlay, and his explicit role as practice-squad depth acquisition rather than a competitive answer at quarterback, the contract represents fair value—not a bargain because there's no upside to exploit, but not an overpay because Washington isn't betting significant resources on an aging backup. In a rebuilding offseason where the Commanders are cycling through roster depth signings and evaluating their quarterback position, this is the definition of a C+ deal: defensible, low-risk, and exactly what a team should pay for veteran insurance that won't implode in an emergency.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jeff's contract sits relative to comparable money.
A Performance grade for Jeff Driskel is not currently available.
Jeff Driskel draws a C+ sentiment grade as the Washington Commanders narrative reflects his on-field role. The veteran quarterback is firmly entrenched in the backup conversation—signed off Arizona's practice squad as roster depth rather than a competitive answer at the position—and the media coverage surrounding him is strictly procedural and transactional. His eight-year career has established him as a serviceable journeyman with a 79.4 career passer rating, the kind of reliable emergency option that won't implode if forced into action but lacks any upside to inspire confidence or fuel storylines. Recent headlines emphasize logistics and necessity—the transactional nature of his signing, his function as insurance depth—with no positive or negative narrative momentum attached to his name beyond acknowledgment of his role in a quarterback room that remains the focal point of fan and media scrutiny. With the Commanders sitting at 5-12 and facing major roster turnover heading into the 2026 season, Driskel occupies the quiet space that veteran backup quarterbacks typically inhabit: essential insurance, zero drama, and zero narrative pull in a league where depth players exist to be forgotten unless disaster strikes.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jeff Driskel is a veteran in his 8th NFL season listed at QB for the Washington Commanders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jeff Driskel, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2022 |
![]() |
| 7 |
| 108 |
| 1 |
| 0 |
| 99.6 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 2 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 3 | 432 | 3 | 2 | 52.1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 3 | 685 | 4 | 4 | 52.1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 9 | 1,003 | 6 | 2 | 47.9 |
Updated May 31, 2026