
#7 QB · Kansas City Chiefs
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
227 lbs
Age
27
College
Ohio State
Draft
2021, Rd 1, #11
Experience
5 yrs
QB Rank
#29 / 106
Grade Justin Fields
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Justin Fields grades out as a strong QB for Kansas City Chiefs (B- Performance). That places him 29th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 59 | 9,039 | 52 | 32 | 84.7 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 9 | 1,259 | 7 | 1 | 89.5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 1,106 | 5 | 1 | 93.3 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$40.0M
Guaranteed
$30.0M
AAV
$20.0M/yr
Justin Fields' contract earns a C+ Contract Value Index, with the $20 million AAV sitting where the comparable-tier deals tend to settle. At 27 years old and five seasons into his NFL career, Fields carries a B- performance grade that reflects competent but inconsistent production—his 2025 season saw limited action at 9 games, positioning him as a depth quarterback rather than a featured player. The $20M AAV for a veteran backup on a two-year rookie deal represents fair market value for a former first-round pick (11th overall, 2021) who retains upside but hasn't yet delivered on early pedigree; it's neither an overpay nor a bargain, but a pragmatic middle ground. What elevates this contract's perceived value beyond the raw dollars is the contextual narrative: Fields' deliberate choice to join Kansas City for mentorship and system development has generated genuine goodwill across media and fan circles, and early OTA reports suggest he's embraced the complementary role with the professionalism that organization rewards. The CVI lands at C+ precisely because the deal is structurally sound for a bridge-option quarterback on a two-year runway, but his limited 2025 game exposure and his secondary status behind an entrenched starter constrain the ceiling—this is a low-risk, modest-upside contract that reflects organizational prudence rather than a gamble on breakout production.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Justin's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Justin Fields enters his fifth NFL season as a known commodity — a former top-10 pick with elite athleticism whose passing consistency has remained a lingering question mark. Now operating within Kansas City's system, the 27-year-old carries a career 84.7 passer rating and 61.4% completion rate into a high-stakes supporting role. His B- grade reflects a player with genuine tools who hasn't yet cemented himself as a franchise-caliber starter. The current season tells a complicated story. His 89.5 passer rating edges the NFL average of 87.8, and his 62.7% completion rate tracks close to the league's 63.6% mark — functional, not elite. His 139.9 passing yards per game, however, falls well short of the 189.3 NFL average, signaling a limited volume role. Where Fields genuinely separates himself is on the ground: his 42.6 rushing yards per game obliterates the elite threshold of 34.8, and his 0.44 rush touchdowns per game nearly quadruples the NFL average of 0.10 — Lamar Jackson-level production in that department. The concern is a troubling consistency of mediocrity — consecutive C- grades in 2023, 2024, and 2025 suggest stagnation rather than development. Fields's ceiling remains tantalizing given his athleticism and improved passer rating over career averages, but his TD rate of 3.43% significantly trails the league's 4.38% average. Watch whether Kansas City's structure finally unlocks his efficiency as a passer, or whether his role permanently consolidates around his rushing dominance at the expense of overall growth.
Justin Fields ranks 29th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Justin between Philip Rivers (B-) just ahead and Carson Wentz (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Philip RiversIndianapolis ColtsB-Jaxson DartNew York GiantsB-Geno SmithNew York JetsB-Graded lower
Carson WentzMinnesota VikingsChiefs add a capable backup QB in a low-risk depth move. Multiple outlets highlight Fields' desire to learn from Mahomes and Reid's system. Fields' motivation to join Kansas City suggests genuine commitment to the organization. Fans see this as smart insurance behind Mahomes without major draft capital spent. Kansas City gains a developmental arm with starting experience for negligible cost.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Justin Fields is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at QB for the Kansas City Chiefs. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Justin Fields, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance B-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 13 | 2,562 | 16 | 9 | 86.3 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 2,242 | 17 | 11 | 85.2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 12 | 1,870 | 7 | 10 | 73.2 |
Updated Jun 7, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.