
QB · New York Jets
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
221 lbs
Age
35
College
West Virginia
Draft
2013, Rd 2, #39
Experience
13 yrs
QB Rank
#28 / 106
Grade Geno Smith
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Geno Smith grades out as a strong QB for New York Jets (B- Performance). That places him 28th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 13+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 109 | 22,168 | 124 | 89 | 87.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 15 | 3,025 | 19 | 17 | 84.7 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 4,320 | 21 | 15 | 93.2 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.3M
Guaranteed
$3.3M
AAV
$3.3M/yr
Salary-cap math on Geno Smith's contract works out to a B Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. At $3.3M AAV on a one-year deal, Smith is priced as a veteran bridge option rather than a long-term franchise anchor—a realistic valuation for an established veteran entering his age-35 season with a B- performance grade trailing an A- sentiment profile. The disconnect between how the league views him personally and what he's actually produced on field is the tension the CVI captures: Smith carried 15 games in 2025 and earned genuine respect as a professional, but the Jets' recent roster churn (kicker and receiver signings, center cuts) signals organizational patience rather than all-in commitment to his success. At this contract size, Smith absorbs minimal cap risk while the organization evaluates younger developmental options at the position—a prudent hedge in a year when the team sits at 3-14 and faces a fundamental QB decision looming beyond this season. The media narrative frames him as a "superhero" comeback storyline and pragmatic stabilizer, which has lifted sentiment, but that A- reflects appreciation for his steadiness and self-awareness, not genuine belief his arm solves New York's structural problems. With one year of control and a manageable salary, the Jets preserve optionality: Smith gets a fair-market rate for a solid bridge veteran, and the franchise maintains roster flexibility to pursue a longer-term QB solution without dead-cap baggage.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Geno's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Geno Smith is a 13-year veteran journeyman who has carved out a respectable late-career starting role after years as a backup. Earning a B- overall grade, he profiles as a functional mid-tier starter capable of managing an offense without consistently elevating it. His career 87.5 passer rating and 65.2% completion rate reflect a more polished quarterback than his current season numbers suggest. This season, Smith's 67.4% completion rate edges above the NFL average of 63.6%, demonstrating genuine accuracy and ball placement as his most transferable skill. However, his 84.7 passer rating sits below the league average of 87.8, and a 4.24% touchdown rate trails the NFL norm of 4.38%, signaling limited big-play production. His 6.75 yards per attempt nearly mirrors the league average of 6.73, confirming he's a volume-efficiency passer rather than a downfield threat — closer to Sam Darnold's floor than Josh Allen's ceiling. Season grades of C- in both 2023 and 2025, bracketing a C in 2024, paint a picture of stagnation rather than growth. At 35, Smith is unlikely to recapture the efficiency that earned him Pro Bowl recognition in Seattle, and his rushing contribution of just 7.3 yards per game well below the 12.3 NFL average further limits his ceiling. The question entering next season isn't whether he can elevate — it's whether a younger option emerges to push him into a veteran bridge role.
Geno Smith ranks 28th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Geno between Daniel Jones (B) just ahead and Justin Fields (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Daniel JonesIndianapolis ColtsBPhilip RiversIndianapolis ColtsB-Jaxson DartNew York GiantsB-Graded lower
Justin FieldsKansas City ChiefsGeno Smith represents a bridge QB solution for the Jets' quarterback uncertainty. Media coverage highlights performance concerns and unresolved roster weaknesses beyond the position. Strong receiver development with Mitchell suggests offensive potential if Smith executes efficiently. Fans debate whether Smith's inconsistency will derail another Jets season despite talent investments. The Jets' success hinges on Smith elevating play while roster construction solidifies competitive depth.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Geno Smith is a veteran in his 13th NFL season listed at QB for the New York Jets. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Geno Smith, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B-, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 3,624 | 20 | 9 | 92.1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 4,282 | 30 | 11 | 100.9 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 4 | 702 | 5 | 1 | 103.0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 1 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 52.1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 2 | 212 | 1 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 2 | 126 | 1 | 1 | 64.6 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 1 | 265 | 2 | 1 | 52.1 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 14 | 2,525 | 13 | 13 | 52.1 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 3,046 | 12 | 21 | 52.1 |
Updated May 26, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.