
#8 QB · Free Agent
Height
6'4"
Weight
222 lbs
Age
32
College
Oregon
Draft
2015, Rd 1, #2
Experience
11 yrs
QB Rank
#30 / 107
Grade Marcus Mariota
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Marcus Mariota grades out as a strong QB for Free Agent (B- Performance). That places him 30th of 107 graded quarterbacks. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 104 | 17,879 | 107 | 62 | 89.7 | |
| 2025 | ![]() | 11 | 1,695 | 10 | 7 | 86.1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 3 | 364 | 4 | 0 | 131.3 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$7.0M
Guaranteed
$6.4M
AAV
$7.0M/yr
This $7M deal for Marcus Mariota represents a fair market transaction for what amounts to high-end backup quarterback insurance. At serviceable starter production levels, Mariota's one-year contract aligns reasonably well with his current capabilities, though it's certainly not a bargain given his inconsistent track record as a full-time starter. The former second overall pick, now 31, has settled into a career phase where he's proven capable of spot duty but lacks the upside to justify significant long-term investment. The contract structure actually works in everyone's favor here — the $6.4M in guaranteed money provides Mariota with solid security while the short term gives his next team maximum flexibility to evaluate whether he can recapture any of his earlier promise. This C-grade CVI reflects a competent but unremarkable signing that neither moves the needle significantly nor represents poor resource allocation, essentially buying a team a known commodity who can manage games if called upon but shouldn't be expected to elevate the offense around him.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Marcus's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Marcus Mariota, the 2014 second-overall pick and 11-year veteran, enters free agency as a capable backup quarterback with a proven track record across multiple offenses. His career passer rating of 89.7 and 7.48 yards per attempt demonstrate a body of work superior to his recent performance, though a three-year decline to C-range grades signals diminishing effectiveness. At 32, Mariota profiles as a stabilizing veteran presence rather than a long-term starter option. This season, Mariota's 86.1 passer rating sits marginally below the NFL average of 87.79, while his 61.2 completion percentage trails the league average of 63.59. However, his 7.47 yards per attempt ranks above average, and his rushing production at 27.0 yards per game significantly exceeds the 12.31 NFL benchmark—a hallmark of his dual-threat capability that remains intact. The concern: volume production of 154.1 passing yards per game trails the average starter, reflecting limited opportunities and reduced arm impact compared to his prime years. Mariota's path forward hinges on his role acceptance and offensive system fit. As a backup or situational quarterback, his above-average mobility and proven resilience offer insurance value for championship-contending teams. Expect him to target franchises prioritizing veteran experience and dual-threat flexibility rather than rebuilding projects, with his next contract likely reflecting a one-to-two year stopgap role rather than a starting commitment.
Marcus Mariota ranks 30th of 107 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Marcus between Geno Smith (B-) just ahead and Andy Dalton (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Geno SmithNew York JetsB-Justin FieldsKansas City ChiefsB-Jaxson DartNew York GiantsB-Graded lower
Andy DaltonPhiladelphia EaglesMarcus Mariota enters 2026 as a respected veteran backup with a secure role in Washington, having re-signed on a one-year deal after a season mentoring rookie QB Jayden Daniels. Media coverage has been consistently positive, framing him as a stabilizing presence and experienced mentor rather than a starting prospect, which aligns with his 11-year career trajectory as a reliable role player. His 89.7 career passer rating and lack of Pro Bowl honors reflect a solid journeyman profile—competent but not elite—and the Commanders' willingness to retain him signals confidence in his locker-room value and game management. Fan perception remains neutral-to-favorable, as Mariota has avoided controversy and earned respect for his professionalism, though he generates minimal excitement as a backup on a modest contract. Heading into 2026, Mariota's reputation is anchored in stability and mentorship rather than on-field stardom, positioning him as a dependable depth piece with positive organizational regard.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Marcus Mariota is a veteran in his 11th NFL season listed at QB for the Free Agent. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Marcus Mariota, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance B-, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 |
![]() |
| 3 |
| 164 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
| 82.5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 13 | 2,219 | 15 | 9 | 88.2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 1 | 226 | 1 | 1 | 60.4 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 7 | 1,203 | 7 | 2 | 56.3 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 14 | 2,528 | 11 | 8 | 56.3 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 15 | 3,232 | 13 | 15 | 56.3 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 15 | 3,426 | 26 | 9 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 12 | 2,818 | 19 | 10 | 56.3 |
Updated Jul 23, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.