
#11 QB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'2"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
34
College
Eastern Illinois
Draft
2014, Rd 2, #62
Experience
12 yrs
QB Rank
#23 / 107
Grade Jimmy Garoppolo
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jimmy Garoppolo grades out as a strong QB for Los Angeles Rams (B Performance). That places him 23rd of 107 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B-, good value. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 85 | 15,828 | 96 | 52 | 97.6 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 1 | 334 | 2 | 1 | 97.0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
**This is a shrewd value play by the Rams.** Jimmy Garoppolo's one-year, $3M deal earns a B- CVI as a classic low-risk, high-reward veteran quarterback signing that addresses depth concerns without breaking the bank. While Garoppolo profiles as a rotational player at this stage of his career, his $3M price tag represents exceptional value for a signal-caller who has extensive playoff experience and can credibly manage an NFL offense if called upon. At 32, he's past his prime as a franchise quarterback, but the fully guaranteed structure eliminates long-term risk while providing the Rams with legitimate insurance behind Matthew Stafford. The short-term commitment allows Los Angeles to reassess their quarterback room next offseason while potentially getting starter-quality production at backup prices if injuries strike. This signing exemplifies smart roster construction — finding experienced veterans willing to take prove-it deals in favorable situations.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Jimmy's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jimmy Garoppolo, a 12-year veteran and former first-round pick, enters 2025 as Los Angeles' established bridge quarterback with a B-grade profile. The 34-year-old has accumulated 85 career starts and carries a career 97.6 passer rating—a testament to his ability to manage games efficiently in structured offenses. His current role reflects his standing: a reliable, experience-laden signal-caller who can win with defense and running game support, not a dynamic playmaker expected to carry a franchise. This season has exposed the age-related decline many anticipated. Garoppolo's 77.7 passer rating sits notably below the NFL average of 87.79, while his 172.1 passing yards per game trail the league average of 189.25 significantly. However, his 65.1 completion percentage holds steady against the 63.59 NFL benchmark, and his 7.13 yards per attempt remains solid. The critical weakness is his inability to create with his legs—5.57 rushing yards per game ranks well below the 12.31 NFL average—limiting his impact outside the pocket and forcing reliance on clean protection. His statistical trajectory from a C-minus in 2025 down from prior seasons signals accelerating decline. Garoppolo's floor remains serviceable in limited snaps or injury replacement scenarios, but his ceiling as a full-time starter has clearly contracted. Watch whether the Rams prioritize youth development at the position or lean further into the veteran's familiarity with Sean McVay's system. His 12-year pedigree carries weight, yet the current metrics suggest diminishing returns on extended playing time.
Jimmy Garoppolo ranks 23rd of 107 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Jimmy between Jayden Daniels (B) just ahead and Daniel Jones (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Jayden DanielsWashington CommandersBTrevor LawrenceJacksonville JaguarsBRussell WilsonNew York GiantsBGraded lower
Daniel JonesIndianapolis ColtsJimmy Garoppolo enters 2026 as a veteran backup option rather than a franchise centerpiece, reflecting his 12-year journeyman trajectory and modest $3M contract. Recent headlines show the Rams remain interested in a reunion and that Garoppolo is actively considering a return after flirting with retirement, which sustains baseline credibility as a capable depth piece. However, the organization's simultaneous exploration of Kirk Cousins for the backup role signals they view Garoppolo as one option among several, not a priority. Media coverage is pragmatic rather than enthusiastic—framing him as a reliable veteran presence without suggesting he will command significant snaps or impact. Overall perception reflects a respected locker-room presence and experienced arm in a backup capacity, but with limited upside narrative or starter expectations heading into the season.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jimmy Garoppolo is a veteran in his 12th NFL season listed at QB for the Los Angeles Rams. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jimmy Garoppolo, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 7 | 1,205 | 7 | 9 | 77.7 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 2,437 | 16 | 4 | 103.0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 3,810 | 20 | 12 | 98.7 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 6 | 1,096 | 7 | 5 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 3,978 | 27 | 13 | 60.4 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | 718 | 5 | 3 | 60.4 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 6 | 1,560 | 7 | 5 | 60.4 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 6 | 502 | 4 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 6 | 182 | 1 | 0 | 52.1 |
Updated Jul 23, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.