
#11 QB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'2"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
34
College
Eastern Illinois
Draft
2014, Rd 2, #62
Experience
12 yrs
QB Rank
#62 / 107
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 85 | 15,828 | 96 | 52 | 97.6 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 1 | 334 | 2 | 1 | 97.0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
**This is a shrewd value play by the Rams.** Jimmy Garoppolo's one-year, $3M deal earns a B- CVI as a classic low-risk, high-reward veteran quarterback signing that addresses depth concerns without breaking the bank. While Garoppolo profiles as a rotational player at this stage of his career, his $3M price tag represents exceptional value for a signal-caller who has extensive playoff experience and can credibly manage an NFL offense if called upon. At 32, he's past his prime as a franchise quarterback, but the fully guaranteed structure eliminates long-term risk while providing the Rams with legitimate insurance behind Matthew Stafford. The short-term commitment allows Los Angeles to reassess their quarterback room next offseason while potentially getting starter-quality production at backup prices if injuries strike. This signing exemplifies smart roster construction — finding experienced veterans willing to take prove-it deals in favorable situations.
Jimmy Garoppolo, a 12-year veteran and former first-round heir apparent to Tom Brady, enters 2025 as a fringe roster option with his career hanging by a thread. His current-season grade sits at a D+, a steep fall for a quarterback who once commanded starter-level respect across the league. Among peers at his experience level, he now ranks well outside meaningful consideration for a featured role. His career numbers tell a more flattering story — a 97.6 passer rating and 67.4 completion percentage reflect a genuinely capable starter over his prime years. But his current-season passer rating of 39.6 sits catastrophically below the NFL average of 77.2 and nowhere near the elite threshold of 101.1. The trajectory has been punishing: after a C in 2024, his 2025 grade has collapsed to an F, signaling a player who has lost functional command of an NFL offense. The concern now isn't a slump — it's irreversibility. At 34 with a history of significant injuries, Garoppolo's window to recapture even a backup-caliber role is narrowing fast. What to watch: whether the Rams find any situational value in his veteran familiarity, or whether 2025 marks the quiet end of a career that promised far more than it ultimately delivered.
Jimmy Garoppolo's Contract Value Index (CVI) earns a damning F grade, reflecting a quarterback whose market perception has cratered amid swirling retirement speculation and organizational abandonment. The Los Angeles Rams' decision to draft Ty Simpson sent an unmistakable signal that they've moved on from Garoppolo, reducing him to a $3M placeholder while the franchise builds toward its future. Despite a respectable 97.6 career passer rating that demonstrates legitimate starter competency, Garoppolo's value has collapsed as retirement rumors dominate the narrative around his 12-year career. Media coverage frames him as a player caught between reluctant backup duty and walking away entirely, with the Rams keeping the door slightly ajar while clearly preferring their rookie investment. The perception is brutally clear: Garoppolo has transitioned from franchise-caliber starter to replacement-level afterthought, with his CVI reflecting a player whose immediate market value has evaporated regardless of his historical production. This F grade captures the reality that sentiment, roster construction, and contractual leverage have aligned against a quarterback who appears closer to retirement than relevance.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 2023 | ![]() | 7 | 1,205 | 7 | 9 | 77.7 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 2,437 | 16 | 4 | 103.0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 3,810 | 20 | 12 | 98.7 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 6 | 1,096 | 7 | 5 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 3,978 | 27 | 13 | 60.4 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | 718 | 5 | 3 | 60.4 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 6 | 1,560 | 7 | 5 | 60.4 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 6 | 502 | 4 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 6 | 182 | 1 | 0 | 52.1 |
Updated Mar 19, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)