
#11 QB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'2"
Weight
225 lbs
Age
34
College
Eastern Illinois
Draft
2014, Rd 2, #62
Experience
12 yrs
QB Rank
#24 / 106
Grade Jimmy Garoppolo
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jimmy Garoppolo grades out as a strong QB for Los Angeles Rams (B Performance). That places him 24th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B-, good value. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 85 | 15,828 | 96 | 52 | 97.6 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 1 | 334 | 2 | 1 | 97.0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$3.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$3.0M/yr
**This is a shrewd value play by the Rams.** Jimmy Garoppolo's one-year, $3M deal earns a B- CVI as a classic low-risk, high-reward veteran quarterback signing that addresses depth concerns without breaking the bank. While Garoppolo profiles as a rotational player at this stage of his career, his $3M price tag represents exceptional value for a signal-caller who has extensive playoff experience and can credibly manage an NFL offense if called upon. At 32, he's past his prime as a franchise quarterback, but the fully guaranteed structure eliminates long-term risk while providing the Rams with legitimate insurance behind Matthew Stafford. The short-term commitment allows Los Angeles to reassess their quarterback room next offseason while potentially getting starter-quality production at backup prices if injuries strike. This signing exemplifies smart roster construction — finding experienced veterans willing to take prove-it deals in favorable situations.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Jimmy's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jimmy Garoppolo, a 12-year veteran and former Patriots heir apparent, enters his Rams chapter as a capable bridge option with a résumé that demands respect. His career 97.6 passer rating and 67.4 completion percentage reflect a quarterback who, at his best, operated efficiently within smart offensive systems. He earns a B overall, a fair reflection of a player whose ceiling remains meaningful even as his floor has dropped. This season tells a more complicated story. His 65.1 completion rate sits near the NFL average of 63.6%, and his 7.13 yards per attempt is serviceable against the league's 6.73 benchmark — signs that the tools are still functional. However, a 77.7 passer rating, well below the NFL average of 87.8, and a meager 5.57 rushing yards per game against a 12.3 league average, reveal a quarterback who can no longer extend plays or manufacture yards outside the pocket. The TD rate of 4.14% is slightly below the league norm of 4.38%, and pass volume at 172.1 yards per game trails the 189.3 average — limiting his upside as a starter. Grading C- in both 2024 and 2025, with a D+ in 2023, Garoppolo's recent trend is hard to ignore. His trajectory points toward a declining role — a high-floor backup or short-term starter in an emergency rather than a franchise centerpiece. The Rams will need clarity at the position soon, but Garoppolo's experience and system intelligence still make him a credible option in the right circumstances.
Jimmy Garoppolo ranks 24th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Jimmy between Trevor Lawrence (B) just ahead and Daniel Jones (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Trevor LawrenceJacksonville JaguarsBKirk CousinsLas Vegas RaidersBRussell WilsonNew York GiantsBGraded lower
Daniel JonesIndianapolis ColtsJimmy Garoppolo's public standing has hit rock bottom, and the F sentiment grade is an accurate reflection of a narrative defined almost entirely by finality rather than football. The dominant storyline entering the 2026 offseason is the reported retirement consideration after 12 NFL seasons — a development that has effectively removed him from legitimate roster conversations before a single snap of the new league year has been played. That perception disconnect is stark when measured against his D+ performance grade, which, while underwhelming, still points to a quarterback with a 97.6 career passer rating and a track record of legitimate starter competency across his prime — yet none of that history is moving the needle on how the media frames his immediate future. The Rams' decision to draft Ty Simpson was the organizational coup de grâce, with coverage framing the pick as an obvious signal that Los Angeles has pivoted toward its next quarterback era, leaving Garoppolo as a $3M placeholder at best. Sean McVay's public non-committal — keeping the door "not closed" on a return — reads less like genuine interest and more like organizational politeness, a characterization the broader media has largely accepted. The result is a narrative that has collapsed around a quarterback who was once considered a franchise cornerstone, now caught between reluctant backup duty and walking away from the game entirely. Until the retirement speculation resolves one way or another, Garoppolo's perception has nowhere to go but sideways.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jimmy Garoppolo is a veteran in his 12th NFL season listed at QB for the Los Angeles Rams. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jimmy Garoppolo, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 7 | 1,205 | 7 | 9 | 77.7 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 2,437 | 16 | 4 | 103.0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 3,810 | 20 | 12 | 98.7 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 6 | 1,096 | 7 | 5 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 3,978 | 27 | 13 | 60.4 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | 718 | 5 | 3 | 60.4 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 6 | 1,560 | 7 | 5 | 60.4 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 6 | 502 | 4 | 0 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 6 | 182 | 1 | 0 | 52.1 |
Updated May 26, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.