
#3 QB · New York Giants
Height
5'11"
Weight
206 lbs
Age
37
College
Wisconsin
Draft
2012, Rd 3, #75
Experience
14 yrs
QB Rank
#23 / 105
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 205 | 46,966 | 353 | 114 | 99.3 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 6 | 831 | 3 | 3 | 77.4 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 11 | 2,482 | 16 | 5 | 95.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | Yds | TD | INT | Rtg | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ![]() | 6 | 831 | 3 | 3 | 77.4 | D- D- |
| 2024 | ![]() | 11 | 2482 | 16 | 5 | 95.6 | C+ C+ |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 3070 | 26 | 8 | 98.0 | B- B- |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 3524 | 16 | 11 | 84.4 | C- C- |
| 2021 | ![]() | 14 | 3113 | 25 | 6 | 103.1 | B B |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 4212 | 40 | 13 | 56.3 | B- B- |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 4110 | 31 | 5 | 56.3 | C+ C+ |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 3448 | 35 | 7 | 110.9 | A- A- |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 3983 | 34 | 11 | 56.3 | C C |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 4219 | 21 | 11 | 56.3 | C- C- |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 4024 | 34 | 8 | 110.1 | A A |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 3475 | 20 | 7 | 56.3 | D+ D+ |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 3357 | 26 | 9 | 101.2 | B+ B+ |
| 2012 | ![]() | 16 | 3118 | 26 | 10 | 100.0 | B B |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$10.5M
Guaranteed
$10.5M
AAV
$10.5M/yr
Salary-cap math on Russell Wilson's contract works out to a C Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. At $10.5M AAV on a one-year deal, Wilson's compensation sits well below the market for even a reliable backup quarterback in 2026, which on paper reflects a prudent investment—but the context around that number tells a far more damaging story. His 2025 season production of 6 games, paired with a C performance grade, signals minimal on-field opportunity and a player operating at the margins of NFL relevance rather than in a starting or even high-priority backup role. At 37 years old with 14 seasons of wear, Wilson occupies the most perilous position a veteran quarterback can: too expensive for true replacement-level work, yet no longer credible as a franchise centerpiece, and the Giants' recent signings at defensive end and linebacker suggest organizational indifference toward his future with the team. The media narrative has shifted decisively from "can he bounce back" to "is it already over," with prominent former NFL voices openly urging retirement and Wilson reportedly exploring television options—a perception gap that makes even a discount contract feel like dead money. The CVI grade reflects a deal that works mathematically in isolation but fails catastrophically in the broader context of a 37-year-old's diminished market value, depleted organizational confidence, and the unmistakable sense that the football world has moved past him.
Tape review and box-score baselines converge on a C performance grade for Russell Wilson. At 37 years old with 14 seasons under his belt, Wilson enters the 2026 offseason as a below-average starter at best—a quarterback whose on-field contributions have eroded to the point where limited opportunity and organizational rejection now define his standing more than his Hall of Fame-caliber résumé. The 2025 season saw him appear in just 6 games, a stark reflection of his benching by New York and the Giants' clear pivot to other options at the position, including the addition of Brandon Allen to the roster this offseason. His key weakness is not talent in isolation but rather durability and relevance: a 37-year-old arm operating in a system where the organization has demonstrably moved on, compounded by a credibility crisis that makes even backup auditions feel like a courtesy rather than genuine competition. The Walter Payton Award winner from 2020 remains among the most decorated players of his generation, yet that historical capital is doing nothing to arrest the narrative of irreversible decline—one that spans media, fan sentiment, and front office action in lockstep alignment. At this career juncture, Wilson occupies a space reserved for aging franchise quarterbacks stripped of leverage: a depth chart liability rather than a solution, facing the humbling reality of a post-playing transition whether he formally retires or secures a low-rung roster spot elsewhere.
Russell Wilson enters the 2026 offseason in the most precarious position of his storied career, having been benched by the New York Giants and facing a near-unanimous chorus of voices — including former NFL peers — publicly urging him to retire. The media narrative has shifted decisively from 'can he bounce back' to 'is it already over,' a tone that reflects genuine concern rather than mere clickbait pessimism. His reported conversations with CBS about a television broadcasting role have further cemented the perception that his playing days are functionally behind him, regardless of any formal retirement announcement. While Wilson's legacy as a franchise cornerstone in Seattle, a Super Bowl champion, and one of the more decorated quarterbacks of his generation remains intact, that historical capital is doing little to shape current fan and media sentiment. At this stage, the prevailing perception is that Wilson is a backup at best and a transitional figure moving toward a post-playing career, with the football world largely having moved on.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Russell Wilson is a veteran in his 14th NFL season listed at QB for the New York Giants. FanVerdicts maintains four independent grades for every NFL player on an active roster — Contract Value Index for the deal itself, Performance for on-field production, Sentiment for media and fan reaction, and Fan Verdict for community voting. Current grades for Russell Wilson: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment F, Fan Verdict pending.
Every grade refreshes on its own cadence as new data lands. Performance recalculates when NFL game stats post; Sentiment updates with new media coverage and fan discussion; Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change; Fan Verdict reflects live community voting on this profile. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) the Contract Value Index grade is computed against.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 3,070 | 26 | 8 | 98.0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 3,524 | 16 | 11 | 84.4 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 14 | 3,113 | 25 | 6 | 103.1 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 4,212 | 40 | 13 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 4,110 | 31 | 5 | 56.3 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 3,448 | 35 | 7 | 110.9 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 3,983 | 34 | 11 | 56.3 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 4,219 | 21 | 11 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 4,024 | 34 | 8 | 110.1 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 3,475 | 20 | 7 | 56.3 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 3,357 | 26 | 9 | 101.2 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 16 | 3,118 | 26 | 10 | 100.0 |
Updated Mar 19, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D-
2025
(50% weight)
C+
2024
(30% weight)
B-
2023
(20% weight)