
QB · Minnesota Vikings
2 transactions this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
207 lbs
Age
28
College
Oklahoma
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
7 yrs
QB Rank
#16 / 107
Grade Kyler Murray
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kyler Murray grades out as a strong QB for Minnesota Vikings (B+ Performance). That places him 16th of 107 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 87 | 20,460 | 121 | 60 | 92.2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 962 | 6 | 3 | 88.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 3,851 | 21 | 11 | 93.5 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Minnesota Vikings got a B Contract Value Index out of the Kyler Murray signing because the guaranteed money matches the production tier. At $1.3M AAV on a one-year deal, Murray is priced as a depth option or bridge starter—a realistic valuation for a 28-year-old veteran entering his seventh season who has seen his market standing erode from his 2019 Offensive Rookie of the Year peak. His B+ performance grade provides some cushion, but the 2025 season brought only five games of production, leaving the market thesis unproven in Minnesota's system. The Contract Value Index reflects that the Vikings have structured this deal with zero long-term commitment; one year means no dead cap risk, no years of regret, and complete flexibility to pivot if the quarterback competition tilts decisively toward the first-round pick. Media framing captures the duality perfectly—Murray arrives as a "high-upside reclamation project" with "legitimate starting credentials," yet he's simultaneously operating as a depth option rather than a franchise cornerstone, which is exactly what his modest salary communicates. The front office's recent roster moves (defensive signings, receiver shuffles, no offensive line reinforcement) suggest Minnesota is betting Murray can carry the load himself, betting that will not materially improve until his on-field production climbs to match the initial hype. This is astute contract construction for a calculated gamble: low risk, meaningful upside, and an escape hatch if the QB room dynamic resolves in McCarthy's favor.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kyler's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kyler Murray stands as a seven-year veteran quarterback in his eighth season with Minnesota, having solidified himself as a starting-caliber dual-threat despite recent performance dips. The 28-year-old carries a career passer rating of 92.2 and 67.1% completion rate, establishing a proven body of work that distinguishes him from his current season snapshot. His B+ grade reflects an established starter whose trajectory has declined from C-range performances across 2023–2025, signaling a concerning downward trend worth monitoring. Murray's elite rushing production remains his defining skill—averaging 33.6 yards per game, nearly triple the NFL average of 12.31 and nearly at the elite threshold of 34.83. His current passer rating of 93.5 sits above the league average of 87.79, and his 68.8% completion percentage outpaces the NFL mean of 63.59, demonstrating solid accuracy and decision-making under center. However, his 3.88% touchdown rate falls below the 4.38% league average, and his 7.12 yards-per-attempt ranks average despite career benchmarks of 6.96—indicating his arm talent hasn't fully compensated for the ground-game reliance. Looking ahead, Murray faces a critical inflection point. The two-year slide from decent production into below-average territory suggests age, injury recovery, or system fit may be constraining his upside. His rushing prowess remains a valuable commodity in today's NFL, but sustained passing efficiency decline warrants scrutiny into whether he can stabilize as a competent starter or if the Vikings should explore alternatives.
Kyler Murray ranks 16th of 107 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Kyler between Joe Burrow (B+) just ahead and Bo Nix (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Joe BurrowCincinnati BengalsB+Jordan LoveGreen Bay PackersB+C.j. StroudHouston TexansB+Graded lower
Bo NixDenver BroncosBVikings add proven talent to compete with McCarthy in open QB battle. Five headlines highlight genuine competition rather than coronation, signaling organizational uncertainty. Murray's mobility offers offensive diversity, though injury history and inconsistency remain concerns. Fans debate starter potential versus bridge-gap role in Minnesota's timeline. Expected outcome: Murray likely serves as veteran insurance while McCarthy develops.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kyler Murray is a player in his 7th NFL season listed at QB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kyler Murray, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B+, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 | 1,799 | 10 | 5 | 89.4 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 2,368 | 14 | 7 | 87.2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 14 | 3,787 | 24 | 10 | 100.6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 3,971 | 26 | 12 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 3,722 | 20 | 12 | 52.1 |
Updated Jul 21, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.