
#2 QB · Green Bay Packers
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'1"
Weight
217 lbs
Age
36
College
Virginia Tech
Draft
2011, Rd 6, #180
Experience
15 yrs
QB Rank
#57 / 106
Grade Tyrod Taylor
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Tyrod Taylor grades out as a middling QB for Green Bay Packers (C- Performance). That places him 57th of 106 graded quarterbacks. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 15+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 100 | 13,033 | 73 | 34 | 87.7 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 6 | 779 | 5 | 5 | 72.9 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 2 | 119 | 3 | 0 | 128.6 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.5M
Guaranteed
$700K
AAV
$2.5M/yr
Tyrod Taylor's contract earns a C+ Contract Value Index, with the $2.5M AAV sitting where the comparable-tier deals tend to settle. At 36 years old in year 15 of his career, Taylor remains a depth-piece investment that doesn't strain the cap—a one-year, low-commitment arrangement typical of veteran backup quarterback insurance. His 2025 season consisted of six games, reflective of emergency-duty usage rather than sustained contribution, and that limited production aligns with a performance grade of C-, the baseline expectation for a reserve at this stage. The Packers' framing of Taylor emphasizes mentorship and veteran stability behind Jordan Love, valuing his leadership and playoff experience over pure on-field backup competition, which matches the realistic market for 15-year veterans in depth roles. At $2.5M annually, the deal carries minimal dead-cap risk and zero roster burden if Love remains healthy and Taylor never takes a meaningful snap—exactly the type of low-cost insurance policy modern front offices build into their quarterback rooms. The one-year structure means the Packers face no long-term commitment, making this a straightforward, risk-neutral transaction that earns its middling Contract Value Index grade: functional depth pricing without upside pretense.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Tyrod's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Among quarterbacks on the Green Bay Packers, Tyrod Taylor's output grades to a C- performance level. At 36 years old with 15 seasons under his belt, Taylor slots into a familiar archetype — the veteran depth piece operating well past his window as a reliable weekly starter, his utility now confined to emergency availability and locker room presence rather than on-field production that moves the needle. His 2025 season: 6 games of limited duty illustrates the narrowed scope of his role; he is not competing for snaps in any meaningful way, and the media framing makes clear that organizational value flows through mentorship and playoff-experience insurance rather than statistical contribution. The core weakness is obvious and unavoidable at his age and position: Taylor lacks the arm talent, mobility window, and consistency required to function as anything more than a short-term, low-pressure stopgap, which is precisely why his arrival in Green Bay registered as a collective shrug from the fan base rather than a statement move. His assignment is straightforward and transparent — stand ready as Jordan Love's backup, keep the quarterback room stable, and stay out of the narrative as long as Love remains healthy — a role he has proven capable of executing across multiple teams in his late-career innings. The sentiment trajectory reflects acceptance rather than excitement, and that baseline of quiet professional competence is exactly what the Packers are paying for.
Tyrod Taylor ranks 57th of 106 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Tyrod between Stetson Bennett IV (C) just ahead and Dj Uiagalelei (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Stetson Bennett IVLos Angeles RamsCJohn WolfordMinnesota VikingsCCam MillerMiami DolphinsCGraded lower
Dj UiagaleleiLos Angeles ChargersTyrod Taylor's sentiment grade lands at C, reflecting how the recent storylines have framed him. The prevailing narrative positions Taylor as a sensible, low-cost insurance policy behind Jordan Love—a professional depth piece whose greatest selling point is also his ceiling on public appeal. Media coverage emphasizes his leadership qualities and veteran stability, with recent headlines spotlighting his offseason relationship-building with Love, suggesting the organization values his mentorship and experience over pure on-field backup competition. Taylor's performance grade of C- aligns with this framing: a 36-year-old in year 15 of his career operating in a depth role, where his 2025 season consisted of six games that represented emergency duty rather than any sustained contribution to winning. The sentiment sits at muted-but-not-hostile acceptance—Packers fans debate whether Taylor provides meaningful improvement or merely adequate insurance, but there's genuine respect for his playoff experience and mobility as an emergency option. As long as Jordan Love stays healthy, the conversation will remain exactly that quiet: functional depth, not a solution.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Tyrod Taylor is a veteran in his 15th NFL season listed at QB for the Green Bay Packers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Tyrod Taylor, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C-, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 11 | 1,341 | 5 | 3 | 89.1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 3 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 94.8 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 6 | 966 | 5 | 5 | 76.7 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 2 | 208 | 0 | 0 | 52.1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 8 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 47.9 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 4 | 473 | 2 | 2 | 47.9 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 15 | 2,799 | 14 | 4 | 52.1 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 15 | 3,023 | 17 | 6 | 52.1 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 14 | 3,035 | 20 | 6 | 56.3 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39.6 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 39.6 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 7 | 179 | 0 | 1 | 62.3 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 3 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 118.8 |
Updated May 25, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.