
#9 QB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'3"
Weight
214 lbs
Age
38
College
Georgia
Draft
2009, Rd 1, #1
Experience
17 yrs
QB Rank
#7 / 107
Grade Matthew Stafford
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Matthew Stafford grades out as an excellent QB for Los Angeles Rams (A- Performance). That places him 7th of 107 graded quarterbacks. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 17+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | INT | RTG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 239 | 64,516 | 423 | 196 | 92.4 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 4,707 | 46 | 8 | 109.2 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 3,762 | 20 | 8 | 93.7 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$84.0M
Guaranteed
$40.0M
AAV
$42.0M/yr
Matthew Stafford's Contract Value Index lands at C+, putting the deal in a defined slice of comparable signings. At $42M average annual value across two years, the extension represents a premium for an elite-tier quarterback coming off a 2025 MVP season and All-Pro 1st Team honors—performance that would justify top-market compensation. However, the C+ verdict reflects the inherent risk premium baked into a two-year pact for a 38-year-old signal-caller, where durability and decline trajectory carry outsized weight relative to his current on-field excellence. Stafford's A- performance grade and his 2025 MVP credentials anchor the deal's legitimacy, but the Rams are banking on compressed remaining runway; at his career stage as a 17-year veteran, the organization appears to be operating within a defined competitive window rather than a long-term investment. The media narrative—oscillating between celebration of his proven winner status and skepticism about sustained success without a fully loaded roster—suggests the market itself views this as a calculated gamble on peak years remaining. The Rams' aggressive defensive retooling (trading for Myles Garrett, adding linebacker and defensive line depth) signals front-office conviction that Stafford's two-year window justifies roster construction around him, even as broader questions about his sustainability linger on the margins of analyst discussion.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Matthew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Matthew Stafford, a 17-year veteran and former top-three draft pick, remains the Los Angeles Rams' franchise cornerstone at 38 years old. Despite recent season-to-season volatility, his current A- grade reflects a still-capable arm operating at above-average efficiency in 2025. Stafford's 109.2 passer rating significantly outpaces the NFL average of 87.79, positioning him among the league's functional starters despite his age. Where Stafford excels is undeniable: a 7.71 TD percentage ranks in the elite tier (NFL average 4.38), and his 7.88 yards per attempt comfortably exceeds league standard of 6.73. His 276.9 passing yards per game demonstrate sustained volume production. However, the concerning trend is unmistakable—he declined from a C- in 2024 to a B- in 2025, suggesting mechanical erosion and decision-making inconsistency that cannot be ignored. His immobility (0.06 rushing yards per game) compounds pressure vulnerability in an increasingly athletic quarterback league. The critical question entering 2026 centers on whether Stafford can sustain his current efficiency or regress further as age compounds injury history. His career 92.4 passer rating and 63.5% completion percentage represent a decorated legacy, yet the downward trajectory warrants monitoring. The Rams face a pivotal decision: leverage his remaining arm talent now or initiate transition planning. Next season's performance will likely determine whether this remains a viable contention window or signals the beginning of the end for an all-time Rams great.
Matthew Stafford ranks 7th of 107 graded quarterbacks by performance. That slots Matthew between Jared Goff (A-) just ahead and Patrick Mahomes (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
Jared GoffDetroit LionsA-Josh AllenBuffalo BillsA-Jalen HurtsPhiladelphia EaglesA-Graded lower
Patrick MahomesKansas City ChiefsMatthew Stafford enters 2026 as one of the NFL's most respected and accomplished quarterbacks, anchored by his 2025 MVP award and first-team All-Pro selection that validate his elite tier status. Media coverage remains decidedly favorable, highlighting his clutch second-half performance and continued "comeback magic," which reinforces his reputation as a high-leverage performer in critical moments. The handful of lighter headlines regarding his appearance and training camp workload management reflect routine offseason chatter rather than substantive concerns about his play or standing. At 17 years into his career with a $42M annual contract, Stafford maintains the perception of a franchise cornerstone and legitimate Super Bowl contender, with no negative coverage suggesting decline or organizational doubt. Fan and media sentiment remains solidly positive, positioning him among the league's elite signal-callers heading into the new season.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Matthew Stafford is a veteran in his 17th NFL season listed at QB for the Los Angeles Rams. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Matthew Stafford, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance A-, Sentiment A+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 | 3,965 | 24 | 11 | 92.5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 9 | 2,087 | 10 | 8 | 87.4 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 4,886 | 41 | 17 | 102.9 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 4,084 | 26 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 8 | 2,499 | 19 | 5 | 60.4 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 3,777 | 21 | 11 | 52.1 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 4,446 | 29 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 4,327 | 24 | 10 | 56.3 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 4,262 | 32 | 13 | 56.3 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 4,257 | 22 | 12 | 56.3 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 4,650 | 29 | 19 | 56.3 |
| 2012 | ![]() | 16 | 4,967 | 20 | 17 | 79.8 |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 5,038 | 41 | 16 | 97.2 |
| 2010 | ![]() | 3 | 535 | 6 | 1 | 91.3 |
| 2009 | ![]() | 10 | 2,267 | 13 | 20 | 61.0 |
Updated Jul 22, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.