
#30 RB · Los Angeles Chargers
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'8"
Weight
215 lbs
Age
24
College
Troy
Draft
2024, Rd 6, #181
Experience
2 yrs
RB Rank
#62 / 175
Grade Kimani Vidal
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kimani Vidal grades out as a middling RB for Los Angeles Chargers (C+ Performance). That places him 62nd of 175 graded running backs. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | YPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 23 | 798 | 3 | 4.0 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 13 | 643 | 3 | 4.1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 155 | 0 | 3.6 |
Updated Jun 21, 2026
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.1M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Spotrac flags Kimani Vidal's contract as a market-rate deal; FanVerdicts grades it B- Contract Value Index because the production-to-pay ratio shakes out accordingly. At $1.075M on a one-year rookie scale contract, Vidal's compensation aligns with his second-year running back status and limited offensive role — the 2025 season saw him log 136 receiving yards and 13 appearances, a solid depth contribution that justifies the modest outlay without demanding premium dollars for a change-of-pace back. The runback here is straightforward: he's being retained as organizational continuity on a restricted free agent tender, a low-risk, low-cost move that keeps a familiar piece in the system rather than gambling on an external free agent. At 24 years old and already two seasons into his tenure, Vidal fits the profile of a serviceable rotational piece — the media narrative emphasizes his reliability behind the starter and his system familiarity, not stardom or breakout potential. The Chargers' recent personnel moves (signing defensive pieces like Derrin James and secondary help, cutting cap casualties) suggest a team focused on competitive stability rather than backfield upgrades, positioning Vidal as exactly what they need: proven depth without unnecessary financial commitment. With just one year on the deal, there's zero dead cap risk, and the contract structure poses no cap complications, making this a text-book efficient depth retention by Los Angeles.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Kimani's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kimani Vidal is a second-year Los Angeles Chargers running back still searching for consistent NFL traction after 23 career games. At 24 years old, the young back possesses developmental upside but remains a complementary piece in the Chargers' backfield rotation rather than an established lead back. His current-season grade of C reflects modest production in a reserve role, though his trajectory warrants patience given his inexperience and the volatility of early-career performance. This season, Vidal has posted 4.15 yards per carry, essentially mirroring the NFL average of 4.11, indicating competent but unremarkable ground efficiency. His rush yardage per game of 49.5 stands above the league average of 22.39, suggesting increased opportunity and volume in 2025 compared to prior seasons. However, his touchdown production of 0.23 per game trails the NFL benchmark of 0.29, underscoring limited redzone impact—a critical deficiency for backs seeking feature roles. The gap between his 2024 grade of D+ and this season's C represents modest improvement, though neither inspires confidence in immediate breakout potential. Vidal's path forward hinges on converting opportunity into consistency. The uptick in volume and efficiency metrics suggests the Chargers are gradually expanding his responsibilities, but he must demonstrate finishing ability and pass-protection acumen to earn true three-down status. Monitor his performance in high-leverage situations next season; sustained production above the 4.15 yards-per-carry benchmark combined with improved touchdown efficiency would signal genuine development into a capable NFL back.
Kimani Vidal ranks 62nd of 175 graded running backs by performance. That slots Kimani between Frank Gore Jr. (C+) just ahead and Cam Akers (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Frank Gore Jr.Buffalo BillsC+Aj DillonCarolina PanthersC+Dameon PiercePhiladelphia EaglesC+Graded lower
Cam AkersSeattle SeahawksChargers re-signing Vidal is a pragmatic depth move, not a statement acquisition. Mixed media coverage suggests limited excitement, with trade speculation indicating internal uncertainty. The RB's role as insurance rather than a lead back reveals his backup status. Fans view this as typical roster maintenance for an unproven young talent. Vidal will compete for carries in an evolving Chargers backfield next season.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kimani Vidal is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at RB for the Los Angeles Chargers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kimani Vidal, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C+, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.