
#39 PK · Detroit Lions
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
202 lbs
Age
27
College
Arkansas
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
2 yrs
PK Rank
#21 / 39
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 34 | 84.1% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 79.4% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 89.7% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 | 0.0% |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.1M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
The Lions secured an absolute steal with Jake Bates at just $1.1M AAV, earning an A- CVI that reflects exceptional value for a reliable kicker. While Bates profiles as a rotational-level talent rather than an elite leg, his production far exceeds what Detroit is paying — most competent kickers command $2-4M annually in today's market, making this deal roughly half of fair market value. At this salary point, the Lions are essentially getting starting-caliber special teams production at backup prices, with minimal downside risk given the short-term commitment. The one-year structure is particularly shrewd, allowing Detroit to reassess after 2024 while maintaining cost control during a competitive window. This represents exactly the type of under-the-radar value play that championship contenders need to execute, freeing up cap space for premium positions while locking down a crucial but often overlooked role at bargain pricing.
Jake Bates earns a D+ grade as the Lions' kicker who has been reliable but not elite across two full seasons in Detroit. His 53 field goals at an 84.1% clip across 34 games is decent production, and his 277 total points show he has been a consistent scorer for the Lions. The UFL-to-NFL pipeline produced an interesting story with Bates, and he has more than held his own since earning the starting job. Back-to-back 17-game seasons demonstrate durability, and the 84% accuracy rate is respectable if not top-tier. Bates needs to push his accuracy above 87-88% to earn a higher grade, but for a kicker who took an unconventional path to the NFL, he has proven he belongs at this level.
The Lions' decision to retain Jake Bates has drawn measured approval from both media and fans, earning a solid B+ grade for this low-key but sensible move. Multiple outlets praised Detroit's pragmatic approach in securing their kicker on a one-year deal, with most analysts viewing Bates as a reliable option who provided the stability this franchise desperately needed at the position. The media narrative centers on continuity and risk mitigation — rather than gambling on an unproven commodity, the Lions chose to stick with a known quantity who demonstrated competence during his rookie campaign. Fan reaction has been notably positive, with supporters appreciating the front office's commitment to maintaining special teams consistency while preserving maximum roster flexibility for future moves. The lack of controversy or debate around this signing actually works in Detroit's favor, as kicker moves that generate headlines are typically disasters rather than success stories.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jake Bates is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at PK for the Detroit Lions. FanVerdicts maintains four independent grades for every NFL player on an active roster — Contract Value Index for the deal itself, Performance for on-field production, Sentiment for media and fan reaction, and Fan Verdict for community voting. Current grades for Jake Bates: Contract Value Index A-, Performance D+, Sentiment B+, Fan Verdict pending.
Every grade refreshes on its own cadence as new data lands. Performance recalculates when NFL game stats post; Sentiment updates with new media coverage and fan discussion; Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change; Fan Verdict reflects live community voting on this profile. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) the Contract Value Index grade is computed against.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
B
2024
(30% weight)
D
2023
(20% weight)