
#9 PK · New York Giants
2 transactions this offseason
Height
6'2"
Weight
202 lbs
Age
39
College
Florida State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
16 yrs
PK Rank
#31 / 39
Grade Graham Gano
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Graham Gano grades out as a shaky PK for New York Giants (D Performance). That places him 31st of 39 graded pks. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 16+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 123 | 83.8% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 5 | 90.0% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 10 | 81.8% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 | 64.7% |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 90.6% |
| 2021 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$16.5M
Guaranteed
$11.3M
AAV
$5.5M/yr
The Giants handed Graham Gano a C CVI with this three-year, $16.5M extension ($5.5M AAV), which represents a slight overpay for a kicker entering his mid-30s with rotational player production. While Gano has been reliable during his Giants tenure, paying premium money ($11.3M guaranteed) for a position player at this performance tier creates questionable salary cap allocation, especially when younger, cheaper options typically emerge each offseason. The 35-year-old kicker's age works against the deal's backend value, as placekickers can experience rapid decline once they hit the wrong side of 35, making that guaranteed money a potential albatross. The contract structure heavily front-loads risk with nearly 70% guaranteed, giving the Giants limited flexibility if Gano's accuracy or leg strength deteriorates over the next two seasons. This feels like the kind of deal where familiarity bred comfort rather than strict value assessment—Gano provides stability, but the Giants likely could have achieved similar production at a significantly lower cost point in a kicker market that consistently offers competent veterans and promising rookies.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Graham's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Graham Gano grades at a D as a veteran kicker whose legendary career is clearly in its final chapter. His 342 career field goals at an 83.8% clip and 1,434 total points across 123 games speak to a kicker who was one of the most reliable in the business for over a decade with Washington, Carolina, and the Giants. But Gano's recent seasons have been plagued by injuries and diminished accuracy — just five games in 2025 and 10 in 2024. When he was connecting from 50-plus yards and hitting game-winners for the Panthers, he was as clutch as they come. The D grade reflects a veteran whose body is no longer cooperating with his talent, and at his age, a return to peak form seems unlikely.
Graham Gano ranks 31st of 39 graded pks by performance. That slots Graham between Lenny Krieg (D+) just ahead and Jake Moody (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Lenny KriegNew York JetsD+Harrison MevisLos Angeles RamsD+Zane GonzalezMiami DolphinsDGraded lower
Jake MoodyFree AgentGraham Gano's public standing with Giants fans and media has cratered to one of the ugliest sentiment readings you'll see for a longtime veteran, and given the circumstances, it's hard to argue against it. The dominant narrative across multiple outlets is a health-forced release story — a 16-year veteran who simply couldn't pass a physical, landing on injured reserve for the second time in 2025, with beat writers framing the departure as a medical inevitability rather than a performance failure. That distinction matters, because Gano's on-field production grade isn't dramatically better — a D performance rating confirms that even in his five games this season, the results weren't salvaging his roster spot. What makes the sentiment uglier than the injury alone is the broader context: fans watching a 4-13 Giants team lose yet another experienced piece from an already unstable roster are rightfully frustrated, and the "glaring special teams void" framing has dominated coverage with real urgency behind it. The recent team activity — signings like DJ Reader and Shelby Harris — signals the front office is at least trying to patch holes, but none of those moves address the kicker market, which only amplifies the perception that New York is scrambling at a critical position. The death threat headlines swirling around Gano add a genuinely disturbing layer to the discourse, underscoring just how toxic fan frustration has gotten in the building. Right now, the narrative is trending marginally upward from its floor, but this remains a cautionary tale about how quickly durability issues can erase goodwill for even the most reliable veterans.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Graham Gano is a veteran in his 16th NFL season listed at PK for the New York Giants. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Graham Gano, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 17 |
| 87.9% |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 96.9% |
| 2018 | ![]() | 12 | 87.5% |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 96.7% |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 78.9% |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 83.3% |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 82.9% |
| 2013 | ![]() | 16 | 88.9% |
| 2012 | ![]() | 6 | 81.8% |
| 2011 | ![]() | 16 | 75.6% |
| 2010 | ![]() | 16 | 68.6% |
| 2009 | ![]() | 4 | 100.0% |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.