
#17 PK · Green Bay Packers
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
201 lbs
Age
34
College
Temple
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
12 yrs
PK Rank
#15 / 39
Grade Brandon Mcmanus
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Brandon Mcmanus grades out as a middling PK for Green Bay Packers (C- Performance). That places him 15th of 39 graded pks. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 154 | 82.0% |
| 2025 | ![]() | 14 | 80.0% |
| 2024 | ![]() | 11 | 95.2% |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 | 81.1% |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 77.8% |
| 2021 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$15.3M
Guaranteed
$5.0M
AAV
$5.1M/yr
This Brandon McManus signing earns a B- CVI, representing solid value for a proven specialist who brings immediate stability to Green Bay's kicking game. At $5.1M AAV over three years, the Packers are paying market rate for a serviceable starter who's consistently delivered in high-pressure situations throughout his career, including clutch performances in Denver's Super Bowl run. The $5.0M guaranteed suggests Green Bay is committed to McManus as their long-term solution, which makes sense given the revolving door they've had at kicker in recent years. While he's not an elite leg like Justin Tucker, McManus offers the kind of reliability that can swing close games, and his playoff experience adds intangible value that's harder to quantify. The three-year term provides roster stability without excessive risk, as kickers can maintain effectiveness well into their 30s, and the guaranteed money protects both sides if injuries arise. For a Packers team that's consistently been in playoff contention, securing a dependable kicker at fair market value represents smart roster construction rather than a flashy move.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Brandon's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Brandon McManus is a 12-year NFL veteran and one of the more traveled kickers of his generation, currently attempting to recapture reliability with the Green Bay Packers at age 34. His overall profile earns a C- grade, reflecting a significant drop from his peak production and a precarious standing among starting-caliber kickers leaguewide. McManus has the career résumé of a legitimate NFL contributor, but the current snapshot raises real questions about his floor. The central concern is straightforward: McManus is connecting on just 80.0% of his field goal attempts this season, well below the NFL average of 85.0% and far from the elite threshold of 93.0%. That gap matters enormously in a kicker's evaluation — missed field goals are momentum killers, and Green Bay cannot afford consistent leakage in the scoring game. His season grades tell a volatile story, bouncing from a D- in 2023 to an A in 2024, then collapsing back to a D- in 2025, suggesting a boom-or-bust pattern rather than the steady excellence Green Bay needs. The 2024 A-grade season proves McManus still has functional upside and isn't simply declining in a straight line. However, the regression in 2025 is too sharp to dismiss, and at 34, the margin for correction shrinks each passing month. Green Bay's front office should monitor whether this is a mechanical slump or the beginning of a harder decline before committing long-term roster resources to the position.
Brandon Mcmanus ranks 15th of 39 graded pks by performance. That slots Brandon between Riley Patterson (C+) just ahead and Tyler Loop (C-) just behind.
Graded higher
Riley PattersonMiami DolphinsC+Cairo SantosChicago BearsCCam LittleJacksonville JaguarsC-Graded lower
Tyler LoopBaltimore RavensThe public perception surrounding Brandon McManus has reached a genuinely dire place, and the F sentiment grade is a fair reflection of where the narrative stands heading into the 2026 offseason. The story driving everything is Green Bay's decision to trade up in the late rounds of the 2026 NFL Draft to select Florida kicker Trey Smack at pick No. 216 — a move that media coverage has almost universally framed not as routine roster competition but as an organizational vote of no confidence in McManus and his $5.1M AAV deal. That framing matters because it shifts the perception from "veteran being pushed" to "veteran being replaced," and the language circulating in recent headlines — explicitly placing McManus "on notice" — carries a pointed, dismissive tone that rarely accompanies healthy positional battles. His C- performance grade only deepens the problem, because a struggling production profile gives the organization no compelling reason to defend his roster spot publicly, and fans and analysts alike are reading the draft capital spent on Smack as confirmation that the front office agreed. The broader roster activity around Green Bay — signings at quarterback, cornerback, defensive tackle, linebacker, and guard — suggests an active, forward-looking front office that is not sentimental about incumbency, which does nothing to improve McManus's standing in the court of public opinion. At 34 years old with 12 seasons of NFL experience, McManus carries the burden of a veteran who now has to prove he belongs rather than one who commands automatic respect, and the prevailing narrative gives him little benefit of the doubt heading into training camp.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Brandon Mcmanus is a veteran in his 12th NFL season listed at PK for the Green Bay Packers. FanVerdicts maintains four independent grades for every NFL player on an active roster — Contract Value Index for the deal itself, Performance for on-field production, Sentiment for media and fan reaction, and Fan Verdict for community voting. Current grades for Brandon Mcmanus: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C-, Sentiment F, Fan Verdict pending.
Every grade refreshes on its own cadence as new data lands. Performance recalculates when NFL game stats post; Sentiment updates with new media coverage and fan discussion; Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change; Fan Verdict reflects live community voting on this profile. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) the Contract Value Index grade is computed against.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 17 |
| 83.9% |
| 2020 | ![]() | 15 | 82.4% |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 85.3% |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 80.0% |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 75.0% |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 85.3% |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 85.7% |
| 2014 | ![]() | 15 | 69.2% |
Updated May 26, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D-
2025
(50% weight)
A
2024
(30% weight)
D-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.