
#84 TE · Jacksonville Jaguars
Height
6'5"
Weight
243 lbs
Age
27
College
Boston College
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
5 yrs
TE Rank
#124 / 164
Grade Hunter Long
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Hunter Long grades out as a shaky TE for Jacksonville Jaguars (D+ Performance). That places him 124th of 164 graded tight ends. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D+, a slight overpay. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 33 | 20 | 153 | 2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 9 | 12 | 85 | 2 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 7 | 60 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 4 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$5.0M
Guaranteed
$3.0M
AAV
$2.5M/yr
Salary-cap math on Hunter Long's contract works out to a D+ Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. A $2.5M annual average on a two-year deal is a reasonable price for a depth-piece tight end, but the contract value equation only works if the player justifies that salary through production or role stability — and Long's 2025 season: 85 receiving yards across 9 games offers no such justification. At 27 years old and five seasons into his career, Long has compiled just 20 receptions for 153 yards total as a Jaguar, a career arc that places him squarely in the replacement-level tier rather than as a reliable third or flex option at the position. The tight end market has shifted toward athletic versatility and red-zone involvement, neither of which Long has demonstrated at a level that commands his salary slot. Jacksonville's recent roster activity — notably signing a rookie tight end in late May and cutting offensive linemen while adding defensive pieces — signals the organization is not banking on Long as part of their offensive future, which reinforces the modest investment reflected in his CVI grade. Unless he produces a meaningful uptick in opportunity and efficiency during the upcoming season, this contract will remain a sunk-cost depth commitment rather than a value play, and the Jaguars' apparent willingness to add competition at the position suggests they view him as expendable.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Hunter's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Tape review and box-score baselines converge on a D+ performance grade for Hunter Long. At 27 years old and five seasons into his NFL career, Long has failed to establish himself as a reliable contributor at tight end, operating strictly as a depth piece within Jacksonville's offensive framework. His 2025 season production of 85 receiving yards across nine games underscores the scale of that underutilization — a volume that places him well below the threshold for a meaningful role at his position. The Jaguars' offseason moves tell the real story: rather than investing in Long or the tight end room broadly, the organization signed rookie Nate Boerkircher and moved resources toward offensive line depth, defensive backs, and interior linemen, signaling that Long remains a roster afterthought. With no breakout performances to hang his hat on and no organizational confidence reflected in his usage or contract, Long enters 2026 as a fourth or fifth-option at his position facing genuine roster pressure. Unless he forces a dramatic offensive impact during training camp and preseason, he is tracking toward either a significant role reduction or exit from Jacksonville's plans entirely.
Hunter Long ranks 124th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Hunter between Chris Manhertz (D+) just ahead and Ben Sinnott (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Chris ManhertzNew York GiantsD+Cade StoverHouston TexansD+Ben SimsMiami DolphinsD+Graded lower
Ben SinnottWashington CommandersHunter Long's public perception sits firmly in negative territory, a D-grade standing that reflects the reality of a five-year veteran who has never meaningfully separated himself from the bottom of a depth chart. The media narrative around the 27-year-old tight end is defined almost entirely by absence — no breakout moments, no contract buzz, no analyst discussion — leaving him in that uncomfortable gray zone where perception defaults to negative simply because there is nothing positive to counter it. That perception aligns squarely with a performance grade of F, and his 2025 season numbers — 85 receiving yards across nine games — confirm he has not functioned as a reliable offensive weapon in Jacksonville's scheme. The Jaguars' recent roster activity does him no favors either; cutting Johnny Mundt at tight end in March created a theoretical opening, but the team's other offseason moves — adding a quarterback, a running back, and a defensive piece via trade — suggest the organization is investing resources elsewhere rather than elevating the tight end room. With the regular season still 125 days out and Long generating virtually zero media traction heading into 2026, the narrative is stuck at neutral-to-negative with no visible catalyst to move it, and unless he forces his way into a meaningful role during training camp and preseason, most NFL observers will continue to have no opinion on him at all — which, at this stage of his career, is its own verdict.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Hunter Long is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at TE for the Jacksonville Jaguars. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Hunter Long, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D+, Performance D+, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2022 | ![]() | 9 | — | — | — |
| 2021 | ![]() | 7 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
Updated Jun 7, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.