GM: James Gladstone
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
90
Players
49
Transactions
84
Players Graded
*(53 active roster + 16 practice squad + IR/PUP/reserve lists)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Jacksonville Jaguars the same way it covers every NFL franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Jacksonville Jaguars, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D-, Performance B, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: James Gladstone.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 84 of 90 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NFL team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Jacksonville Jaguars
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, Jacksonville Jaguars is paying a slight premium relative to production (D- Contract Value Index). That ranks 32nd of 32 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as an above-average roster (B Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The Jacksonville Jaguars' contract portfolio earns a D- Contract Value Index (CVI), a brutal indictment of how poorly this roster is deployed against its salary cap — and with a 13-4 record and an AFC South playoff position already locked in, the sting cuts deeper. Of the 32 graded contracts across the 37-man roster, only five represent genuine value plays, while eight deals qualify as clear overpays, a ratio that reflects a front office hemorrhaging resources on below-market production. The secondary has been the sole bright spot: cornerbacks are built on solid value, providing a foundation of cost-controlled production in a premium position. Safeties, by contrast, represent the portfolio's most egregious inefficiency, with contracts that underperform their salary commitments and drag down the overall evaluation. With 32 of 37 rostered players graded, the CVI captures a representative sample of Jacksonville's financial architecture, and what it shows is a team built with little regard for modern cap efficiency — a critical vulnerability when competing in a salary-cap league, even with playoff credentials. This front office has backed itself into a corner where competing at a high level now may come at the expense of sustained flexibility in the years ahead.
The Jacksonville Jaguars roster earns a B performance grade—a solid, competitive group that lacks the top-tier star power to be considered championship-caliber, but one stacked enough in the middle to field a winning team. With 26 of 37 players graded and no elite-tier talent on the roster, Jacksonville is built on starter-and-rotation depth: four legitimate starters anchor the lineup, seven rotation players provide flexible depth, and 15 additional pieces fill out the depth chart. The quarterback room stands as the team's most reliable asset, offering above-average execution at the league's most important position, while the center position represents the clearest area of vulnerability heading into the season. The Jaguars' on-field performance—a 13-4 record with an eight-game winning streak and AFC South positioning—suggests the current roster construction is executing better than the lack of elite talent might indicate, likely powered by strong starter play and coaching. However, with no true franchise-caliber centerpiece and a 15-player depth contingent, Jacksonville remains vulnerable to injury and offers limited margin for error on any given Sunday. The roster composition hints at a team closer to the veteran, balanced-contributor model than the star-powered blueprint, which explains both the consistency of the 13-4 record and the ceiling limitations: they win tight games through execution, not dominant talent at single positions.
Jacksonville Jaguars ranks 32nd of 32 graded teams by Contract Value Index. The nearest team ahead is the New York Jets (D+).
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.
The Jacksonville fanbase is deeply frustrated with the Jaguars' offseason moves, and that frustration is reflected in a sentiment grade of F across 27 total transactions evaluated. Of those 27 moves, only 8 drew positive reactions from media and fans, while 11 landed in mixed territory and 8 faced outright criticism—a split that tells a clear story of a front office struggling to build confidence during what should be a window-of-opportunity period for a 13-4 playoff team. The bright spot was the Trystan Colon signing, which earned an A grade and represented one of the few moves that moved the needle positively. Conversely, the Sal Wormley acquisition bottomed out at an F grade and became the symbol of the offseason's miscalculations. The 8-11-8 breakdown reveals a front office caught between ambition and execution—not bad enough to appear completely rudderless, but not good enough to build momentum heading into the regular season in 91 days. With a 13-4 record and playoff position already locked in, the Jaguars need to prove they can complement their roster without creating the perception of whiffing on depth, and right now the fanbase is waiting to see if these moves pan out or confirm their worst fears about roster construction.