
#92 DE · Washington Commanders
Height
6'4"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
29
College
Kansas
Draft
2018, Rd 4, #116
Experience
8 yrs
DE Rank
#32 / 147
Grade Dorance Armstrong
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Dorance Armstrong grades out as a strong DE for Washington Commanders (B- Performance). That places him 32nd of 147 graded defensive ends. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is negative (D- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 116 | 34.0 | 232 | 22 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 7 | 5.5 | 24 | 4 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 5.0 | 39 | 6 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$33.0M
Guaranteed
$16.1M
AAV
$11.0M/yr
The Commanders landed a fair deal with Dorance Armstrong at $11M AAV, earning a C+ CVI that reflects solid value for a proven pass rusher. Armstrong's production as a solid starter justifies this contract range, though Washington is paying market rate rather than securing a bargain for his consistent edge rushing ability. At 27, Armstrong is entering his prime years, making this three-year commitment well-timed to capture his best football while avoiding the risk of paying for decline. The $16.1M in guaranteed money provides reasonable protection for Washington without creating long-term dead money concerns if his production falters. This represents competent roster building — the Commanders identified a need at defensive end and paid appropriately for a reliable contributor who should provide steady pressure and run defense over the contract's duration.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Dorance's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Dorance Armstrong is an eight-year veteran defensive end for Washington who has quietly emerged as a consistent pass-rush contributor. At 29 years old with 116 career games played, he occupies a familiar NFL archetype: the reliable rotational defender who generates above-average production without commanding superstar attention. This season, Armstrong has delivered his strongest performance in recent years, earning a B grade after consecutive C+ campaigns in 2023 and 2024. Armstrong's current season tape reveals elite-level sack production at 0.79 per game, substantially above the NFL average of 0.19 and exceeding the elite benchmark of 0.66. His quarterback hit rate of 1.00 per game also ranks above average compared to the league standard of 0.43, indicating consistent pressure generation when he gets upfield. Tackle for loss metrics at 0.57 per game represent solid above-average output, though slightly below elite thresholds at 0.68, suggesting he occasionally loses leverage in pursuit situations. The primary concern remains consistency—Armstrong's inconsistent production across 2023 and 2024 raises questions about durability and whether this B-caliber season represents sustainable improvement or a statistical anomaly. His career trajectory indicates he performs best as a situational pass rusher rather than a full-time defensive end, making him most effective in obvious passing downs. Moving forward, Washington should monitor whether Armstrong can maintain elite sack rates and QB pressure in 2025 to justify continued starting snaps in their defensive line rotation.
Dorance Armstrong ranks 32nd of 147 graded defensive ends by performance. That slots Dorance between Kwity Paye (B) just ahead and Milton Williams (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Kwity PayeLas Vegas RaidersBDenico AutryHouston TexansBGrady JarrettChicago BearsBGraded lower
Milton WilliamsNew England PatriotsDorance Armstrong enters 2026 as a depth defensive end facing significant perception headwinds following a 2025 injury that has landed him on the Commanders' PUP list alongside Deatrich Wise. Media coverage has shifted decidedly skeptical, with multiple outlets framing his upcoming season as a 'prove-it' moment rather than a continuation of established production. At eight years into his career with 34 sacks and no Pro Bowl selections, Armstrong lacks the star power to weather injury-related negativity; the narrative has moved from reliable contributor to player fighting for roster relevance. Fan and analyst sentiment reflects cautious pessimism about his ability to return to form, compounded by the Commanders' apparent openness to alternatives at the position. Unless Armstrong demonstrates a swift, healthy return during training camp, perception will likely remain depressed heading into the regular season.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Dorance Armstrong is a veteran in his 8th NFL season listed at DE for the Washington Commanders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Dorance Armstrong, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance B-, Sentiment D-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 7.5 |
| 38 |
| 6 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 8.5 | 33 | 3.5 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 13 | 5.0 | 37 | 0.5 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 33 | 1 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 15 | 0 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 15 | 0.5 | 13 | 1 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B
2025
(50% weight)
C+
2024
(30% weight)
C+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.