Adam Peters

C+

Top 48% — above averageCVI

Bottom 5%Sentiment

C-

Below averageFan Verdict

Fan Verdict

Grade this GM::

Should Adam Peters be kept, fired, or extended?

Transactions

Graded

Fan Votes

2 years

Tenure

League Comparison

Sentiment Rank

of 32 GMs

Fan Verdict Rank

of 5 GMs

#30

Most Active

19 moves

Contract Value

C+

Fair market contracts

OverpayFair ValueGreat Value

Washington Commanders' contract spending this season has been roughly in line with what the market dictates — no major steals, but no egregious overpays either. Across 12 contracts, 4 grade out as good value and 3 look like overpays based on comparable deals around the league. The best bang-for-the-buck deal was Drake Jackson (A-) at $1.4M/yr — getting defensive end production well above the price point. The priciest commitment relative to production was Dyami Brown (F) at $3.0M/yr — the wide receiver market may have been richer than the on-field return suggests. The spending approach is neither aggressive nor conservative — a wait-and-see approach from a cap perspective.

Public Sentiment

Poor reception

NegativeMixedPositive

Washington Commanders' 2026 moves under Adam Peters have drawn significant criticism from fans and media alike. Of 19 graded moves, 13 landed well with the fanbase, 2 drew mixed reactions, and 4 were viewed negatively. The standout move was bringing in Jeremy Reaves (A+), which generated the most positive buzz. The most questioned decision was the Tyler Biadasz cut (F), which drew the sharpest criticism. The overall direction has been well-received — this front office is building with a clear vision.