
#50 DE · Chicago Bears
Height
6'1"
Weight
294 lbs
Age
33
College
Clemson
Draft
2015, Rd 5, #137
Experience
11 yrs
DE Rank
#31 / 147
Grade Grady Jarrett
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Grady Jarrett grades out as a strong DE for Chicago Bears (B Performance). That places him 31st of 147 graded defensive ends. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 11+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 166 | 38.0 | 535 | 73.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 14 | 1.5 | 39 | 3.5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 2.5 | 53 | 12.5 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 8 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$42.8M
Guaranteed
$27.3M
AAV
$14.3M/yr
The Bears took a calculated gamble on veteran presence that looks like a slight overpay given the production mismatch. Jarrett's $14.3M AAV puts him in starting defensive end territory, but his current output aligns more with a rotational player role — creating an immediate disconnect between salary and on-field value that earns a C- CVI. At 31, the former Falcons stalwart is likely past his prime pass-rushing days, making this three-year commitment particularly risky given the backloaded guaranteed money structure. The $27.3M in guarantees provides Chicago with some flexibility to move on after two seasons, but they're essentially betting $42.8M total that Jarrett can elevate his game back to above-average starter level in a new system. This feels like the Bears prioritizing leadership and veteran savvy over pure value efficiency — a defensible roster-building philosophy, but one that rarely grades out favorably from a pure contract value perspective.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Grady's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Grady Jarrett is a 11-year veteran interior disruptor who carved out a legitimate Pro Bowl-caliber career as Atlanta's anchor before landing in Chicago. He earns a B overall grade, reflecting a decorated body of work that outpaces what his current-season numbers alone would suggest. Among veteran defensive tackles, Jarrett remains a respected presence, though his best days appear to be receding in the rearview. His QB hit rate of 0.57 per game actually exceeds the NFL average of 0.43, showing he still possesses the hand-fighting quickness to trouble interior linemen. However, his sack rate of 0.11 per game falls well below the league average of 0.19, and his TFL rate of 0.25 nearly matches the NFL norm of 0.27 without crossing into impact territory. The concern isn't effort — it's finishing, as Jarrett is generating pressure without converting it into splash plays. His season trend tells a sobering story: after a C in 2023 and a modest C+ in 2024, Jarrett has slipped to a D+ in 2025, signaling meaningful decline rather than a temporary dip. At 33, the realistic ceiling is a rotational contributor who provides veteran leadership and occasional interior push. Chicago should monitor whether his pressure generation can translate into turnovers or sacks, or whether a reduced role better suits this stage of his career.
Grady Jarrett ranks 31st of 147 graded defensive ends by performance. That slots Grady between Leonard Floyd (B) just ahead and Dorance Armstrong (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Leonard FloydAtlanta FalconsBKwity PayeLas Vegas RaidersBDenico AutryHouston TexansBGraded lower
Dorance ArmstrongWashington CommandersGrady Jarrett enters 2026 as a respected veteran defensive lineman whose media perception has stabilized around a competent, self-aware starter rather than a star. His first season with Chicago (2025) underperformed relative to expectations, but recent headlines emphasize his accountability and role as a defensive anchor—language that resonates positively with fan bases valuing veteran leadership. The absence of Pro Bowl or All-Pro recognition keeps his reputation tier anchored in the solid-starter range, though his 11-year tenure and 38-sack career provide credibility. Media coverage leans constructive rather than critical, with narratives framing him as a stabilizing presence rather than a declining asset, suggesting fans view him as a dependable if unspectacular contributor. Heading into 2026, perception hinges on whether he can deliver the improved performance he publicly committed to, with fan sentiment cautiously optimistic but not elevated to star-tier expectations.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Grady Jarrett is a veteran in his 11th NFL season listed at DE for the Chicago Bears. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Grady Jarrett, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance B, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 1.5 |
| 23 |
| 3 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 6.0 | 61 | 7.5 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 1.0 | 59 | 10 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 4.0 | 52 | 8 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 7.5 | 69 | 9 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 14 | 6.0 | 52 | 6 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 4.0 | 55 | 10 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 3.0 | 48 | 2 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 15 | 1.0 | 24 | 2 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
C+
2024
(30% weight)
C
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.