Timothy Mckay

Current Contract

Contract Value Index (CVI)

Timothy McKay's $0.8M annual deal with Washington earns a solid C+ CVI, representing fair value for a guard at the NFL minimum tier. At less than $1M per year, McKay falls into the low-risk category where even replacement-level production justifies the investment, and Washington is essentially getting a cost-controlled roster spot with minimal downside. The Commanders are likely banking on developmental upside or depth value, as guards in this salary range typically serve as either projects with untapped potential or reliable backups who won't break the bank. Given the minimal financial commitment, Washington can afford to take a flyer on McKay's ability to contribute on the interior line without significant cap implications if he doesn't pan out. This C+ CVI reflects smart roster management — not a steal, but a reasonable bet on affordable depth that allows the franchise to allocate premium dollars elsewhere while maintaining competitive guard play.

Performance Analysis

Timothy McKay is firmly in replacement-level territory at guard through his rookie season, and with a D+ performance grade, there is very little in his profile right now that suggests he is pushing for a meaningful role on this roster. His resume through two games is essentially a blank page — there simply is not enough sample size to identify a statistical strength, which itself tells the story of how limited his opportunities have been. The most pressing concern is his injury history, and it has already manifested in Year One: McKay was placed on the non-football injury list early before eventually being activated, a pattern consistent with the medical red flags that followed him out of the draft process. As an undrafted free agent on an $0.8M deal, he carries the low-tier roster status that comes with that designation, and his trajectory right now is best described as a developmental prospect fighting to stay on the field rather than competing for a starting job. The surrounding narrative is clear — the coverage framing him as a player who "slid because of injury" signals that evaluators around the league already had documented concerns about his durability before he ever took an NFL snap. At 24, McKay has time on his side in theory, but the combination of limited game action, a recurring injury management situation, and modest organizational investment makes this a profile that requires significant monitoring heading into 2026 training camp. Until he can string together healthy, consistent reps, any projection about his upside is premature.