
#49 TE · Indianapolis Colts
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'5"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
28
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
5 yrs
TE Rank
#154 / 164
Grade Sean McKeon
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Sean McKeon grades out as a poor TE for Indianapolis Colts (F Performance). That places him 154th of 164 graded tight ends. Against that production, his deal reads as a slight overpay on the Contract Value Index (D) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 45 | 6 | 38 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2024 | ![]() | 3 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 9 |
| Season | Team | GP | Rec | Yds | TD | YPR | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ![]() | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | F F |
| 2022 | ![]() | 13 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 5.5 | F F |
| 2021 | ![]() | 9 | 4 | 27 | 1 | 6.8 | F F |
| 2020 | ![]() | 14 | — | — | — | — | C- C- |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Total Value
$1.2M
AAV
$1.2M/yr
Indianapolis Colts got a D Contract Value Index out of the Sean McKeon signing because the guaranteed money matches the production tier. McKeon appeared in one game during the 2025 season, logging minimal counting stats as a backup tight end—exactly what you'd expect from a practice squad elevation executed under roster duress with less than a week to Week 18. At $1.215M AAV, he's priced as a depth piece, which is appropriate for a player offering nothing beyond replacement-level blocking and emergency snaps; the tight end market doesn't reward backup-only contributors at any salary, and this deal reflects that reality. At 28 years old and six seasons into his career, McKeon has settled into the veteran minimum tier, a fringe roster player with no pathway to meaningful production or cap flexibility gains. The media consensus—and the numbers support it—pegs this as pure desperation management: a franchise limping to an 8-9 finish with a seven-game losing streak doesn't elevate backup tight ends because they're part of the long-term plan. His CVI grade of D reflects the core problem: you're paying for a body to fill a hole, not for value creation, and the on-field performance (F) confirms there's nothing to grade higher.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Sean's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Sean McKeon's F grade with the Colts reflects a tight end whose NFL career has been defined by blocking rather than receiving production. McKeon has been a reliable in-line blocker at his various stops, but the pass-catching numbers have been virtually nonexistent. His F grade captures a player who is essentially invisible in the passing game while providing adequate run-blocking support. Indianapolis keeps him for his physicality at the point of attack, not his ability to stretch the seam or create mismatches. The modern NFL demands more versatility from tight ends, and McKeon's one-dimensional game limits his overall value. He's a roster fringe player whose best asset doesn't show up in the stat sheet.
Sean McKeon ranks 154th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Sean between Brenden Bates (D-) just ahead and Feleipe Franks (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Brenden BatesCleveland BrownsD-Messiah SwinsonGreen Bay PackersD-McCallan CastlesGreen Bay PackersFGraded lower
Feleipe FranksAtlanta FalconsSean McKeon's arrival in Indianapolis has generated about as much excitement as a mid-January roster cut, with public perception landing squarely in D territory — collective indifference being the most charitable way to describe the reaction. Every media signal points to the same conclusion: this was a desperation move, pure and simple, with the Colts scrambling to patch their tight end room ahead of a Week 18 showdown against the Texans after injuries forced their hand. That narrative aligns perfectly with McKeon's on-field output, where a performance grade of F confirms he offers virtually nothing beyond replacement-level blocking duties — a six-year veteran who remains on the roster by necessity, not merit. The broader team context doesn't help his standing either; the Colts have been shedding bodies across the offensive line and defensive front in recent weeks, and a franchise finishing a losing season at 8-9 with a seven-game skid doesn't exactly provide a flattering backdrop for a practice squad elevation. The bottom line is stark: McKeon is the definition of a forgettable transaction, a depth piece elevated under duress with no fantasy relevance, no long-term roster projection, and a media narrative that barely registered before moving on entirely.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Sean McKeon is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at TE for the Indianapolis Colts. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Sean McKeon, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance F, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 13 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 9 | 4 | 27 | 1 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 14 | — | — | — |
Updated Mar 25, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.