
#86 TE · Cleveland Browns
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
26
College
Wake Forest
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
3 yrs
TE Rank
#147 / 173
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 28 | 8 | 55 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 11 | 6 | 51 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 2 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.0M
AAV
$1.0M/yr
The Browns secured solid depth value with Blake Whiteheart's one-year, $1.0M deal, earning a C+ CVI that reflects appropriate compensation for a depth piece at tight end. At just $1M annually, Cleveland is paying basement-level money for a player who provides reliable insurance behind their primary targets, making this the type of low-risk roster construction that championship teams execute consistently. The minimal financial commitment means Whiteheart only needs to contribute on special teams and spot duty to justify his salary, while any offensive production becomes pure upside for the Browns. The single-year structure gives both sides flexibility — Cleveland can evaluate his development without long-term risk, while Whiteheart gets an opportunity to prove he deserves a larger role in 2025. This represents smart roster management by the Browns, addressing depth needs without hampering their ability to pursue premium talent at more impactful positions.
Blake Whiteheart pulls an F for the Browns at tight end, a young player who has not made any discernible impact on Cleveland's offense. Whiteheart has been buried behind more experienced options and has not done anything in limited action to suggest he deserves more playing time. His blocking has been subpar, and his receiving contributions are essentially zero. The Browns tight end room has needed help, but Whiteheart has not been the answer. He is a developmental player who may not develop fast enough to stick on an NFL roster long-term.
A low-risk depth retention that keeps the tight end room minimally stable heading into 2025. Multiple headlines confirm the re-signing, framing it as a depth move rather than a meaningful upgrade. The key red flag: Whiteheart fumbled without contact against Miami, raising reliability concerns. Fans are largely indifferent, viewing this as roster filler behind more important offseason priorities. Whiteheart projects as a roster bubble candidate who must outperform expectations just to secure a final spot.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| — |
| — |
| — |
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
F
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)