
#20 RB · Los Angeles Rams
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'9"
Weight
198 lbs
Age
27
College
Fresno State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
4 yrs
RB Rank
#169 / 186
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | YPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 45 | 295 | — | 4.1 | |
| 2025 | ![]() | 11 | 46 | 0 | 5.1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 99 | 0 | 4.5 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 9 | 129 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.1M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
The Los Angeles Rams' decision to retain Ronnie Rivers at $1.1M earns a D+ CVI, representing a slight overpay for an unproven commodity in their backfield rotation. Rivers remains firmly in replacement-level territory despite multiple seasons in the system, and while the one-year, $1.1M deal carries minimal financial risk, it's still above market value for a player who hasn't demonstrated he can be counted on for meaningful contributions. At 25, Rivers is past the typical developmental window for running backs, making this more of a familiarity play than a talent investment. The short-term structure does provide the Rams with flexibility to pivot quickly if Rivers fails to step up, but they're essentially paying starter money for a player who profiles as a practice squad candidate. This contract suggests the Rams are betting on system familiarity over proven production, a risky proposition when roster spots and salary cap dollars should be allocated toward players who can actually contribute on game days.
Ronnie Rivers' F grade with the Rams tells the story of a running back who simply hasn't produced enough to stay relevant on an NFL roster. Rivers has been a depth option behind more established backs, and his limited touches haven't yielded impressive results. His F grade reflects a player with below-average efficiency and no standout skill that would separate him from the running back crowd. The Rams need dynamic backs who can create explosive plays, and Rivers hasn't shown that ability. His receiving skills are his best asset, but they haven't been enough to carve out a meaningful role. Rivers is fighting for survival on a roster that can easily replace his production.
Rams keep a reliable backup in place with a low-commitment one-year deal. All five headlines confirm this is routine roster maintenance, nothing more. Rivers' backup status signals he won't challenge for significant carries this season. Fans view this as a sensible depth move, neither exciting nor concerning. Expect Rivers to remain the third-string option behind the primary ball carrier.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0 |
| 4.0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 8 | 21 | 0 | 2.3 |
Updated Mar 19, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
F
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)