
#6 LB · Pittsburgh Steelers
Height
6'0"
Weight
232 lbs
Age
26
College
LSU
Draft
2020, Rd 1, #28
Experience
6 yrs
LB Rank
#29 / 338
Grade Patrick Queen
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Patrick Queen grades out as a strong LB for Pittsburgh Steelers (B+ Performance). That places him 29th of 338 graded linebackers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B-, good value. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 101 | 703 | 15.5 | 4 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 120 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 129 | 1.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$41.0M
Guaranteed
$13.8M
AAV
$13.7M/yr
Pittsburgh struck a reasonable deal in landing Patrick Queen for $13.7M AAV, earning a B- CVI that reflects solid value for an above-average starter at linebacker. Queen's production tier justifies this investment — he's not elite, but he's a proven commodity who can anchor the middle of a defense without breaking the bank in today's inflated market. At 25, he's entering his prime years, making the three-year commitment perfectly timed to capture his best football while avoiding the risk of a longer-term deal into his decline phase. The $13.8M guaranteed keeps Pittsburgh's downside manageable, essentially making this a one-year commitment with two team-friendly option years if Queen elevates his game further. This signing addresses a clear need without the franchise-crippling risk that comes with chasing marquee names, giving the Steelers a dependable defensive anchor at fair market rate.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Patrick's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Per-game impact for Patrick Queen pencils out to a B+ performance grade. Queen represents a solidly above-average starter at linebacker whose 2025 season output—120 tackles across 17 games—underscores his reliability as a run-stuffer and high-volume defender, even if the limited sack production (1.0) reflects the core of his profile: a thumper rather than a disruptive edge threat. His tackle volume is the statistical pillar driving his grade; the near-negligible sack total exposes why he hasn't climbed into elite territory despite his consistent deployment. Durability is a strength—he played every game last season—but so is the gap between his actual production and his public perception, which the recent contract stalemate and trade-rumor dismissal have only amplified. At 26 years old and in his sixth season, Queen sits at the inflection point where a 6-year veteran either crystallizes into a long-term anchor or begins to see his leverage erode; his on-field case is solid, but the lack of movement in extension talks introduces real uncertainty about how Pittsburgh values him relative to market peers. A standout 2026 campaign or a swift contract resolution would likely elevate both his grade and standing significantly.
Patrick Queen ranks 29th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Patrick between Devin Lloyd (B+) just ahead and Brian Burns (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
Devin LloydCarolina PanthersB+Nate LandmanLos Angeles RamsB+E.j. SpeedHouston TexansB+Graded lower
Brian BurnsNew York GiantsB+Inside the Pittsburgh Steelers ecosystem, the take on Patrick Queen settles at a B sentiment grade. The narrative around him has pivoted meaningfully over the last two weeks — his direct dismissal of trade-rumor chatter as a "charade" and his measured, professional stance on contract extension talks have resonated positively with the fanbase and local media, projecting quiet confidence and commitment to Pittsburgh rather than drama or restlessness. There's a notable gap between perception and production here: his on-field work earns a B+ grade (120 tackles and 17 games played in the 2025 season), suggesting he's delivering starter-caliber linebacker play, yet the public conversation remains filtered through the lens of contract uncertainty and a sense that he's underappreciated relative to his actual value. The Steelers' recent offseason activity — adding defensive depth and rotating the secondary — doesn't directly reshape Queen's standing, but the lack of visible forward movement on extension negotiations keeps enthusiasm from climbing higher. Bottom line: Queen is viewed as a dependable, high-effort defensive anchor whose reputation has room to grow; a contract resolution or a dominant 2026 campaign would likely push sentiment into the A range.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Patrick Queen is a player in his 6th NFL season listed at LB for the Pittsburgh Steelers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Patrick Queen, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance B+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 133 |
| 3.5 |
| 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 117 | 5.0 | 2 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 98 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 106 | 3.0 | 1 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
B+
2024
(30% weight)
B+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.