
#53 LB · Los Angeles Rams
Height
6'3"
Weight
235 lbs
Age
27
College
Colorado
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
4 yrs
LB Rank
#27 / 339
Grade Nate Landman
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nate Landman grades out as a strong LB for Los Angeles Rams (B+ Performance). That places him 27th of 339 graded linebackers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at B, good value. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 53 | 324 | 4.5 | 2 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 132 | 2.5 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 13 | 81 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 16 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$22.5M
Guaranteed
$10.3M
AAV
$7.5M/yr
The Rams secured solid value by locking up Nate Landman at $7.5M AAV, a deal that earns a B CVI and represents fair market pricing for an above-average starting linebacker. At this contract level, Landman sits in that sweet spot where his production justifies the investment without breaking the bank — he's not an elite difference-maker, but he's a reliable three-down player who can anchor the middle of a defense. The three-year term provides Los Angeles with stability at a crucial position while the $10.3M guaranteed keeps the financial risk manageable if his performance plateaus. This isn't a contract that will age poorly or handcuff the franchise, as linebacker salaries in this range typically hold their value well for competent starters. The Rams clearly identified Landman as a foundational piece worth investing in, and at $7.5M annually, they're paying appropriately for a player who should continue delivering consistent, if unspectacular, production in their defensive scheme.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Nate's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Nate Landman is a four-year NFL veteran and established run-defender for the Los Angeles Rams, entering his age-27 season as a dependable two-down linebacker. After a disappointing 2024 campaign, the Colorado product has rebounded with a B+ performance in 2025, reasserting himself as a productive tackler in Sean McVay's defense. While he lacks the explosive pass-rush upside of elite off-ball linebackers, Landman remains a reliable three-down contributor with clear strengths in gap discipline. The 2025 season has showcased Landman's elite tackle production, averaging 7.76 tackles per game against the NFL average of 2.19, placing him firmly in the upper echelon of the position. His tackling volume represents a significant uptick from his sluggish 2024 showing, confirming he can still impact games at the first and second level. However, sack production remains a career concern at 0.15 per game—matching the league average but well below the elite threshold of 0.51—suggesting limited value as a pass-rusher. His above-average pass defense metrics (0.35 PD per game) and tackle-for-loss rate (0.65 TFL per game) indicate he's functional in coverage and diagnosing plays downfield. Landman's trajectory suggests a floor-to-ceiling reassessment after last season's decline. If he sustains this tackle-heavy volume and maintains above-average run-defense grades, he projects as a solid mid-tier starter capable of 110-130 tackles annually. The critical question entering 2026 is whether this B+ season represents genuine reinvention or a temporary rebound before another regression, making consistency the ultimate measure of his remaining value.
Nate Landman ranks 27th of 339 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Nate between T.j. Watt (A-) just ahead and E.j. Speed (B+) just behind.
Graded higher
T.j. WattPittsburgh SteelersA-Devin LloydCarolina PanthersB+Frankie LuvuFree AgentB+Graded lower
E.j. SpeedHouston TexansB+Nate Landman enters 2026 as a respected but underrated defensive contributor for the Rams, occupying the middle tier of linebacker perception around the league. Recent contract extension and media framing as a 'hidden key' to defensive success suggest the organization and beat writers view him as a reliable, ascending player rather than a depth piece. However, his exclusion from top linebacker rankings reflects the reality that he lacks Pro Bowl or All-Pro credentials despite solid production, keeping him in the solid-starter category rather than elite conversation. The positive narrative arc—highlighted by feature stories on his journey and 2025 season highlights—indicates growing recognition of his value, though this remains largely a Rams-centric story rather than national acclaim. Heading into 2026, Landman's perception is anchored by consistent, dependable play and organizational confidence, but he will need standout statistical performance or postseason success to break into the league's upper-tier linebacker discourse.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nate Landman is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at LB for the Los Angeles Rams. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nate Landman, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance B+, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 110 |
| 2.0 |
| 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 7 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 |
Updated Jun 10, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B+
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
B
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.