
LB · Las Vegas Raiders
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'11"
Weight
231 lbs
Age
25
College
Georgia
Draft
2022, Rd 3, #83
Experience
4 yrs
LB Rank
#80 / 339
Grade Nakobe Dean
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Nakobe Dean grades out as a strong LB for Las Vegas Raiders (B- Performance). That places him 80th of 339 graded linebackers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 47 | 226 | 7.5 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 10 | 55 | 4.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 15 | 128 | 3.0 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 5 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$36.0M
Guaranteed
$20.0M
AAV
$12.0M/yr
Salary-cap math on Nakobe Dean's contract works out to a C Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. Dean's 2025 season numbers—55 tackles and 4 sacks across 10 games—paint a solid-contributor picture that aligns with the B- performance grade, but a $12M AAV commitment for a fourth-year linebacker entering a three-year deal carries meaningful risk at the position. Linebacker salaries have compressed significantly in the modern pass-happy NFL, and while Dean's Georgia pedigree and early media reception as a "savvy upgrade" generated initial optimism, the recent minicamp absences and the team's need to downplay those situations inject caution into the value calculus. At 25 years old with four seasons of NFL exposure already logged, Dean is no longer operating within a developmental timeline—he is what he is, and $12M per year asks the Raiders to bet that a part-time run-defender in 2025 becomes franchise-critical by the time this deal matures. The Raiders' concurrent roster churn—releasing multiple depth pieces and cycling through signings—suggests organizational uncertainty about defensive philosophy that could leave this linebacker deal looking inflexible if the scheme shifts or injuries resurface. For a team sitting at 3-14 with significant rebuilding ahead, locking in $12M AAV on a lateral move rather than a star acquisition represents a misalignment of resources and risk tolerance that the C grade appropriately captures.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Nakobe's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Nakobe Dean remains a high-volume tackler and reliable run-defender for Las Vegas, posting 5.50 tackles per game—well above the 2.19 NFL average and approaching elite territory at 7.32. The fourth-year linebacker has carved out a consistent starting role despite modest draft expectations, showcasing the kind of productive floor that justifies his place in the Raiders' defensive rotation. His B-minus grade reflects a capable, lunch-pail defender who executes his gap assignments but lacks the coverage instincts or pass-rush dominance to become a premier NFL signal-caller. Dean's calling card remains his tackle volume and run-stopping aggression, evidenced by 0.40 sacks per game—above the 0.15 league average and respectable for the position. However, his pass-defense metrics paint a concerning picture: 0.10 passes defensed per game trails the NFL average of 0.18, and his 0.25 tackles for loss per game sits just shy of the 0.27 benchmark. This gap suggests he struggles with lateral agility in space and coverage assignment, limitations that compound in modern offenses demanding linebackers to handle slot receivers and check-down targets with precision. The recent dip to a C grade in 2025 warrants monitoring, particularly if this represents a durability or scheme-fit issue rather than permanent decline. Dean possesses the foundation to stabilize a weak linebacker room, but his ceiling appears capped at a dependable two-down player rather than a three-down catalyst. Watch whether Las Vegas adjusts its defensive architecture to maximize his run-stopping strength while minimizing coverage exposure.
Nakobe Dean ranks 80th of 339 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Nakobe between Dee Winters (B-) just ahead and Yaya Diaby (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
Dee WintersSan Francisco 49ersB-DJ WonnumDetroit LionsB-D.j. WonnumDetroit LionsB-Graded lower
Yaya DiabyTampa Bay BuccaneersB-Raiders add experienced linebacker depth with Nakobe Dean signing. Multiple outlets covered the move, highlighting culture-building and position group strengthening efforts. Dean brings proven NFL experience to stabilize a rebuilding defensive unit. Fans debate whether he ranks competitively within a tough AFC West linebacker landscape. Dean figures as a solid rotational contributor and potential starter if injuries strike.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Nakobe Dean is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at LB for the Las Vegas Raiders. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Nakobe Dean, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance B-, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 30 |
| 0.5 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 13 | 0.0 | 0 |
Updated Jul 20, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C
2025
(50% weight)
B
2024
(30% weight)
C
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.