GM: John Spytek
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
83
Players
34
Transactions
83
Players Graded
*(53 active roster + 16 practice squad + IR/PUP/reserve lists)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Las Vegas Raiders the same way it covers every NFL franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Las Vegas Raiders, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B, Performance F, Sentiment C-. Front office leadership: John Spytek.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 83 of 83 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The NFL team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Las Vegas Raiders
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, Las Vegas Raiders is getting good value for the money (B Contract Value Index). That ranks 12th of 32 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a roster among the league’s thinnest (F Performance). The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The Las Vegas Raiders' contract portfolio earns a B Contract Value Index (CVI), reflecting a roster caught between necessary salary flexibility and unavoidable overpayment commitments. Of the 22 graded contracts spanning their 22-man roster, six deals represent genuine value — the kind of team-friendly agreements that provide cap runway — but seven represent clear overpays that compound the challenge of building around a 3-14 foundation. Defensive tackle is where the Raiders have done their homework, securing above-market efficiency at that position; running back tells the opposite story, with cap commitments that outpace positional production and market reality. The front office has evaluated their entire active roster, leaving no blind spots in the assessment, which underscores how thorough — and how costly — their current wage structure has become. This CVI grade reflects a team in difficult cap circumstance: not historically reckless, but hamstrung by specific positional mistakes that will require either creative restructuring or attrition to address heading into a season where every dollar matters for a rebuild. The Raiders' path forward hinges on whether the front office can extract value from the six solid deals while managing — or moving — the seven anchors that are dragging down overall portfolio efficiency.
Las Vegas Raiders ranks 12th of 32 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the New England Patriots (B+) just ahead and the New Orleans Saints (B-) just behind.
Graded higher
New England PatriotsB+Denver BroncosB+Houston TexansB+Graded lower
New Orleans SaintsB-The Las Vegas Raiders roster earns an F performance grade and represents a bottom-feeder collection that is fundamentally unsuited for competitive football at the NFL level. With only one starter among 22 graded players and a depth chart that is 59 percent roster filler (13 depth pieces), this is an inverted organizational structure—one where the foundation is missing and replacements are merely warm bodies. The defensive line, anchored by the DT position group, is the only unit offering legitimate positional strength; by contrast, the cornerback room is a historically weak link that will hemorrhage production against any competent passing attack. The absence of elite players (zero) combined with just one reliable starter suggests an offense and defense both operating at substandard efficiency, with neither side capable of generating the sustained pressure or coverage needed to win games. Against a 3-14 record and 0-7 road record already in the books, this F grade is not a projection—it is a reflection of organizational dysfunction playing out in real time. The path forward requires wholesale roster reconstruction rather than incremental improvement; as the offseason stretches toward September, the Raiders are positioned to absorb further losses unless a dramatic overhaul of talent occurs at multiple levels.
The Las Vegas Raiders fanbase is treading water—cautiously skeptical but not yet at full revolt. Of the team's 33 total transactions this offseason, just 7 earned genuine approval from the media and fan community, while 16 landed in the muddled middle and 10 drew outright criticism, a ratio that screams "we're not confident in this direction." The brightest spot came with the Brandon Johnson acquisition, which graded as an A-tier move and represented one of the few unambiguous wins the front office has landed. On the flip side, the Charles Snowden transaction earned an F grade and stands as the clearest indictment of the roster-building approach, crystalizing fan doubts about the decision-making at the top. With only a 3-14 record and zero traction in a brutal AFC West, the team is banking on a reset narrative heading into the regular season; right now, the fanbase's patience is paper-thin, and they're watching closely to see whether the front office's mixed portfolio of moves actually translates to improvement. The sentiment grade of C- reflects a community that wants to believe in the rebuild but hasn't seen nearly enough evidence to turn skepticism into genuine optimism—expect the tone to shift sharply one way or the other once games begin on September 10th.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.