
#69 DT · Kansas City Chiefs
Height
6'4"
Weight
330 lbs
Age
34
College
Colorado State-Pueblo
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
11 yrs
DT Rank
#184 / 218
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 154 | 5.0 | 257 | 19 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 26 | 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 3.0 | 25 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 3 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
The Chiefs landed solid value with Mike Pennel's $1.3M deal, securing a proven depth piece at a bargain rate that earns a B CVI. While Pennel operates as a rotational player rather than a featured starter, his one-year contract represents shrewd roster management for a team prioritizing championship windows over long-term commitments. At 33, the veteran defensive tackle brings exactly what Kansas City needs — reliable interior presence who can spell Chris Jones and provide steady snaps without breaking the bank. The short-term structure eliminates future salary cap complications while giving the Chiefs flexibility to pivot if younger options emerge or if Pennel's age finally catches up to his production. This is textbook depth signing execution: modest investment, defined role, minimal risk with legitimate upside if the defensive line suffers injuries during another playoff push.
Mike Pennel earns a D- grade as a veteran nose tackle providing depth for the Chiefs' interior defensive line. His massive frame occupies space and clogs running lanes, which is his primary contribution to Kansas City's defense. Pennel's role is narrow — he's a run-down specialist who comes off the field in passing situations — but the Chiefs value having a big body available in their rotation. His pass-rush contributions are essentially nonexistent, which limits his overall grade and snap count. He does one thing adequately, and the Chiefs use him accordingly.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.0 |
| 4 |
| 1 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 0.0 | 26 | 6 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 10 | 0.0 | 21 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 14 | 0.0 | 29 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 8 | 1.0 | 24 | 2 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 27 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 35 | 0 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 8 | 0.0 | 7 | 2 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 1.0 | 25 | 2 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 13 | 0.0 | 8 | 1 |
Updated Mar 19, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
F
2024
(30% weight)
D
2023
(20% weight)