
#83 WR · Denver Broncos
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
190 lbs
Age
28
College
San Diego
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
3 yrs
WR Rank
#145 / 295
Grade Michael Bandy
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Michael Bandy grades out as a middling WR for Denver Broncos (C Performance). That places him 145th of 295 graded wide receivers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 14 | 14 | 139 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 4 | 50 | 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 3 | 3 | 48 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 |
Total Value
$1.1M
Guaranteed
$10K
AAV
$1.1M/yr
The C+ Contract Value Index on Michael Bandy's deal stems from how the cap hit lines up against on-field output. At $1.085M AAV, this is a low-cost depth contract that doesn't strain Denver's salary structure, which is appropriate for a 5-year veteran receiver posting 50 receiving yards across 4 games in 2025—marginal production that doesn't justify premium spending or roster certainty. For a sub-$1.1M annual commitment on a fringe depth piece, Denver isn't overpaying in absolute terms, but the CVI reflects the mismatch between what Bandy has delivered on field (a C-grade performance) and what the market demands of receivers vying for consistent snaps. At 28 years old, Bandy is past the developmental window and operating as a proven veteran with a limited track record; the contract appropriately prices him as a camp body and special teams contributor rather than a path-to-production bet. Media framing and fan sentiment converge here—he's a low-risk, minimal-impact signing tied to Denver's coaching transition and roster churn, not a talent expected to reshape the receiver room or compete for starting reps. The C+ verdict acknowledges that Denver isn't misallocating capital on this deal, but it also signals there's no upside leverage to exploit; this contract is priced fairly for exactly what Bandy is: serviceable depth with no roster security and marginal offensive prospects.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Michael's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Production at WR earns Michael Bandy a C performance grade in the current sample. His 2025 season output of 50 receiving yards across 4 games reflects a depth-piece role with minimal offensive opportunities—the kind of limited production you'd expect from a fringe roster contributor competing for snaps in a crowded receiver room. The receiving yards total is the only meaningful counting stat from his appearances, and it underscores how little impact he's generating on offense when given the chance. At 28 and five seasons into his NFL career, Bandy is operating as a veteran backup rather than a developing prospect, which frames this as a last-chance audition: he needs to prove he can hold a spot on a 14-3 AFC West-leading roster rather than show upside. The media narrative positions him squarely as a low-risk depth addition and special teams contributor, with the Broncos' recent offseason moves emphasizing secondary and tight end depth over receiver investment—a signal that the front office views him as a training camp body fighting for a practice squad slot or final roster bubble position rather than a competitive upgrade to their passing game.
Michael Bandy ranks 145th of 295 graded wide receivers by performance. That slots Michael between Terrace Marshall Jr. (C) just ahead and Cedric Tillman (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Terrace Marshall Jr.Miami DolphinsCOlamide ZaccheausAtlanta FalconsCMecole Hardman Jr.Buffalo BillsCGraded lower
Cedric TillmanMichael Bandy draws a D sentiment grade as the Denver Broncos narrative reflects his on-field role. The disconnect is worth examining: media coverage frames him as a "low-risk depth addition" with "minimal" competitive impact, yet five headlines surrounding his return suggest moderate interest in what should be routine roster filler—a gap that hints at cautious optimism beneath the surface. His 2025 season production (50 receiving yards across 4 games) explains the muted coverage; he's a fringe receiver competing for a practice squad spot or final bubble position, not a talent expected to reshape Denver's room. Recent team moves like the Sean Payton hire and concurrent signings of Mike Woods and Dallen Bentley have reinforced the narrative that Bandy is a camp body filling depth, not a centerpiece of the rebuild. The sentiment trajectory tells the real story: Bandy opened to A-grade reception, likely riding optimism around a fresh coaching regime and his familiar Denver connection, but that goodwill has cratered to D as the reality of his limited track record—capped by the muffed punt liability—has set in. Fans and media are no longer banking on upside; they're resigned to viewing him as exactly what he's been: a special teams contributor with marginal offensive prospects, serviceable depth with no roster security.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Michael Bandy is a player in his 3rd NFL season listed at WR for the Denver Broncos. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Michael Bandy, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| — |
| — |
| — |
| 2022 | ![]() | 10 | 10 | 89 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — |
Updated May 20, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.