
#58 RP · Athletics
Height
6'3"
Weight
210 lbs
Age
33
College
N/A
Draft
2011, Rd 6, #194
Experience
8 yrs
Bats/Throws
R/R
Grade Scott Barlow
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Scott Barlow grades out as a middling RP for Athletics (C+ Performance). That places him 218th of 395 graded relief pitchers. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C+, fairly priced. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | ERA | W-L | K | WHIP | IP | SV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 475 | 3.762295 | 31-24 | 564 | 1.2827868 | 0.0 | 61 |
| 2026 | ![]() | 36 | 6.48 | 2-0 | 29 | 1.35 | 33.1 | 2 |
| 2025 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$2.0M
Guaranteed
$1.2M
AAV
$2.0M/yr
Earning a C+ Contract Value Index, Scott Barlow's 1-year pact reflects the Athletics' read on the free-agent market. At $2M AAV, this is a low-commitment deal for a 33-year-old right-hander with eight years of professional experience, and it aligns neatly with his B- performance grade—solid, reliable work that doesn't demand star-tier compensation. Barlow carries veteran credibility after his long career arc, but at this stage, the Athletics are clearly positioning him as depth and leadership presence rather than a cornerstone bullpen piece; the media framing bears this out, emphasizing his stabilizing role in a transitional roster over any expectation of high-leverage dominance. The one-year structure eliminates long-term commitment risk and signals Oakland's flexibility as they shuffle the bullpen alongside recent acquisitions, allowing them to evaluate Barlow's fit without tying up future cap space. If Barlow carves out a defined closer role as the regular season winds down over the next 132 days, the narrative could shift upward, but for now, the CVI grade reflects what this contract actually is: a pragmatic veteran minimum for a capable but unspectacular piece in a rebuilding bullpen.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Scott's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Scott Barlow ranks 218th of 395 graded relief pitchers by performance. That slots Scott between Brandan Bidois (B-) just ahead and Tyler Kinley (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Brandan BidoisPiratesB-TIM HillYankeesB-Brock StewartDodgersB-Graded lower
Tyler KinleyBravesAuto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Scott Barlow is a veteran in his 8th MLB season listed at RP for the Athletics. FanVerdicts covers every MLB player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Scott Barlow, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance C+, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when MLB game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The MLB player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
![]() |
| 75 |
| 4.21 |
| 6-3 |
| 75 |
| 1.39 |
| 68.1 |
| 1 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 63 | 4.25 | 3-3 | 68 | 1.36 | 55.0 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 38 | 5.35 | 2-4 | 47 | 1.55 | 38.2 | 13 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 25 | 3.07 | 0-2 | 32 | 1.19 | 29.1 | 0 |
| 2023 | 63 | 4.37 | 2-6 | 79 | 1.40 | 68.0 | 13 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 69 | 2.18 | 7-4 | 77 | 1.00 | 74.1 | 24 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 71 | 2.42 | 5-3 | 91 | 1.20 | 74.1 | 16 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 32 | 4.20 | 2-1 | 39 | 1.20 | 30.0 | 2 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 61 | 4.22 | 3-3 | 92 | 1.44 | 70.1 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 6 | 3.60 | 1-1 | 15 | 1.27 | 15.0 | 0 |
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.