
American League · West Division
General Manager: David Forst
Oakland Coliseum
Roster grades based on player performance, contract value, and fan sentiment.
42
Players
52
Transactions
13
Contracts Graded
*(26-man active roster + 40-man expanded roster)
Talk anything about the team
Loading…
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
FanVerdicts covers the Athletics the same way it covers every MLB franchise — every player, every contract, every move — and asks fans where the team really stands. Cast your Fan Verdict on the Athletics, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts brings its own read too — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index A, Performance C, Sentiment F. Front office leadership: David Forst.
FanVerdicts' Contract Value Index read reflects the value distribution across 13 of 42 active roster players carrying graded contracts — positive-value deals versus overpays. The performance read rolls up per-player on-field grades weighted by playing time, and the sentiment read reflects the recent transaction window (typically last 14 days), so it can shift quickly when a major signing or trade lands.
For league-wide context, the MLB hub has team rankings, GM report cards, draft simulations, and the transactions feed. The MLB team rankings page sorts every team by Contract Value Index, Performance, and Sentiment side-by-side.
Grade the Athletics
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the Contract Value Index, Athletics is getting clear surplus value from its contracts (A Contract Value Index). That ranks 5th of 27 on Contract Value Index. The roster grades as a middle-of-the-pack roster (C Performance). The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal.
The Athletics are getting outstanding value across the roster, earning a A CVI grade across 13 contracts evaluated. 3 contracts grade as positive value (B+ or better), while 10 fall below fair market value. Several contracts are grading below expectations, putting pressure on the payroll. With payroll well-allocated, the team has flexibility for deadline acquisitions or future free agent pursuits. Of 42 total rostered players, 13 have contracts eligible for CVI evaluation. This is one of the best-managed payrolls in MLB, positioning the franchise well for sustained competitiveness.
The Athletics are a fringe playoff team with a fractured roster trapped between competition and reconstruction. Their 38-40 record and precarious #7 AL West seed understate the structural problem: only four ace-caliber players anchoring a 42-man roster, with nine quality contributors and a bloated middle tier of 17 league-average arms and bats that generate replacement-level production at scale. That composition—28 transactions over this window reveal constant shuffling—suggests front-office desperation to find complementary depth rather than organic roster chemistry, and it shows in their inconsistent splits (18-23 at home, 20-17 on the road, L2 streak). The four aces are likely carrying unsustainable offensive and pitching loads; without a deep bench of reliable secondary contributors, injury to any top-tier player exposes the 11 depth-level roster fillers who cannot sustain a run. Their 5-5 record over the last 10 games indicates they are treading water, not ascending, with 97 days left to separate contention from seller status. This is a "try to stay relevant" team, not a championship window core, and unless the ace-tier cohort is supplemented by surprising mid-season acquisition impact, the Athletics will limp to the finish line as a cautionary tale of middling construction.
The Oakland Athletics are staring down a fan and media confidence crisis despite a mixed transaction portfolio that offered fleeting moments of hope. Out of 28 total moves this offseason, only 9 landed as genuinely positive reactions—a 32% approval rate that tells you everything about the organizational direction. The 15 mixed-reception deals and 4 outright negative ones suggest a fanbase caught between cautious skepticism and resignation: some moves sparked debate, but none ignited sustained enthusiasm. The standout bright spot was the Joel Kuhnel acquisition (A+ grade), a clear win that briefly energized the conversation, while the Brooks Kriske signing (D-) became a lightning rod for criticism and emblematic of front office miscalculation. With the Athletics currently sitting at 38-40 and fighting for relevance in the AL West with 97 days remaining in the regular season, the transaction mix—heavy on hedging bets and light on franchise cornerstones—reads as treading water rather than competing. The sentiment floor is that fans see construction, not a clear path, and until the team demonstrates consistent on-field improvement or lands a marquee move with legitimate upside, the F-grade verdict reflects a fanbase that's checked out waiting for proof the front office has a plan.
Athletics ranks 5th of 27 graded teams by Contract Value Index. That slots them between the Brewers (A+) just ahead and the Yankees (A) just behind.
Peers ranked by Contract Value Index grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.