Cast your verdict:
A low-risk depth retention that keeps a familiar face in the offensive tackle room. Five headlines covered the move, all framing it as a straightforward re-signing with minimal fanfare. The key signal is the swing tackle label — Tenuta isn't penciled in as a starter. Fans are largely indifferent, viewing this as standard roster maintenance rather than meaningful improvement. Tenuta projects as a backup swing tackle competing for a roster spot, nothing more.
This extension grades out as an overpay for the Indianapolis Colts — the team is paying more than the on-field production currently warrants. Luke's on-field performance ranks in the bottom quartile among NFL OTs, grading him as an unproven at the position. His $960K average annual value ranks as bargain money for the OT market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — unproven output at bargain money means the team is paying a premium above the player's on-field value. The one-year deal minimizes the team's financial risk, effectively making this a prove-it contract.
Cast your verdict:
No fan votes yet. Be the first!
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...