
#36 RB · Minnesota Vikings
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'1"
Weight
219 lbs
Age
26
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
1 yr
RB Rank
#145 / 175
Grade Zavier Scott
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Zavier Scott grades out as a shaky RB for Minnesota Vikings (D Performance). That places him 145th of 175 graded running backs. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | YPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 16 | 114 | — | 3.6 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 16 | 114 | 0 | 3.6 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 3 | 74 | 1 | 5.3 |
Updated Mar 20, 2026
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.0M
AAV
$1.0M/yr
Among RB contracts at this AAV tier, Zavier Scott earns a C- Contract Value Index. At $1.005M annually, Scott's deal reflects his status as a depth piece operating well below the salary band for even replacement-level running backs, yet the C- grade acknowledges that his 2025 season production—98 receiving yards and 7 tackles across 16 games—does not justify acceleration in cost. The Vikings are paying minimal money for minimal output, which technically aligns value to performance, but the underlying issue is that Scott's contributions (limited offensive touches, special teams reserve role) place him in the lowest tier of roster utility. At 26 with two seasons of NFL experience, Scott is past the developmental window where underutilized depth can be excused; he is what he has proven to be—a practice squad–adjacent contributor with no measurable path to regular offensive snaps. Given the mediaFraming positions this as routine roster maintenance for an exclusive rights tender with bottom-tier upside, there is no upside case to justify even a modest raise; the Vikings are simply retaining a body for organizational continuity rather than investing in competitive depth. The C- reflects that below a certain production floor, contract structure becomes nearly irrelevant—Scott's deal is neither exploitative nor valuable, merely placeholder money for a placeholder roster slot.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Zavier's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Zavier Scott's tape and counting stats together earn a D performance grade. The second-year running back operates firmly in the bottom tier of positional depth, lacking the explosiveness or consistency required to compete for meaningful snaps in a competitive backfield. His 2025 season production—98 receiving yards and 7 tackles across 16 games—reflects a special teams and marginal reserve role rather than offensive impact, with the receiving yardage total underscoring his minimal involvement in the Vikings' passing game. Scott's durability in appearing in all 16 games is notable for availability, but that availability masked an absence of distinction; his role remained confined to depth and situational work without evidence of progression. As a former practice squad fixture with a University of Maine background, Scott represents the kind of roster filler teams cycle through during offseason maintenance rather than a player expected to elevate the position group. The Vikings' re-signing via exclusive rights tender signals they view him as organizational continuity at the practice squad level—a designation that aligns perfectly with his production profile and frames any regular season opportunity as an emergency backup scenario, not a competitive addition.
Zavier Scott ranks 145th of 175 graded running backs by performance. That slots Zavier between Trayveon Williams (D) just ahead and Chris Brooks (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Trayveon WilliamsCleveland BrownsDTerrell JenningsNew England PatriotsDJosh WilliamsTampa Bay BuccaneersDGraded lower
Chris BrooksGreen Bay PackersThe media and fan reaction to Zavier Scott's signing has been notably muted, reflecting his status as a fringe roster player rather than a meaningful acquisition. Coverage has characterized the move as routine roster maintenance for a former practice squad running back with minimal NFL impact, with his University of Maine background and exclusive rights tender status signaling bottom-tier depth. Five headlines covering the transaction suggest the Vikings are simply managing their 90-man roster rather than adding genuine competition at the position. Fans appear largely indifferent to retaining a special teams contributor whose offensive upside remains extremely limited after bouncing between practice squads. The consensus expectation is that Scott will compete for a practice squad spot with minimal chance of earning regular season touches, positioning this as a low-stakes depth move that generates little excitement or concern among the fanbase.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Zavier Scott is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at RB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Zavier Scott, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D-
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.