
#42 TE · Los Angeles Chargers
Height
6'4"
Weight
285 lbs
Age
27
College
Stanford
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
2 yrs
TE Rank
#137 / 164
Grade Tucker Fisk
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Tucker Fisk grades out as a shaky TE for Los Angeles Chargers (D Performance). That places him 137th of 164 graded tight ends. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 25 | 10 | 67 | — |
| 2025 | ![]() | 10 | 2 | 19 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 7 | 39 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 6 |
| Season | Team | GP | Rec | Yds | TD | YPR | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ![]() | 10 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 9.5 | D D |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 7 | 39 | 0 | 5.6 | D D |
| 2023 | ![]() | 6 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9.0 | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
Length
1 year
Total Value
$915K
AAV
$915K/yr
Performance versus salary tier earns Tucker Fisk a C- Contract Value Index, with cap structure shaping the verdict. At $915K on a one-year deal, Fisk occupies the space of a true depth piece—a contract so modest it signals organizational indifference rather than investment. His 2025 season production of 19 receiving yards across 10 games underscores why: he registered virtually no impact in the passing game, and the D performance grade reflects minimal statistical footprint or role definition within the Chargers' offensive scheme. For a fourth-year tight end at 27, the developmental narrative has largely exhausted itself, and his current salary reflects realistic market positioning for a reserve-level contributor rather than a mispriced bargain. The C- CVI acknowledges that there is no structural overpay here—the Chargers are paying replacement-level money for a replacement-level role—but the absence of meaningful production or positional scarcity also means Fisk generates no outsized value on the other side of the ledger. With the team's recent activity at tight end and across the roster, institutional indifference toward Fisk appears warranted, and his contract carries neither upside nor meaningful downside risk given its brevity and minimal financial footprint.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Tucker's contract sits relative to comparable money.
The D performance grade on Tucker Fisk reflects how his statistical baseline holds against the tight end field. His 2025 season produced 19 receiving yards across 10 games—a depth-piece floor that signals minimal involvement in the Chargers' offensive scheme and no discernible impact on game outcomes. The absence of any meaningful receiving production is the defining weakness; at 27 years old and in his fourth season, the bar for demonstrating competence has long since passed, and Fisk has failed to clear it. He's occupied a reserve role with limited durability and, more critically, minimal production whenever he has been on the field, leaving virtually no statistical footprint to argue for expanded opportunity. The mediaFraming makes clear that Los Angeles views him as institutional depth—his $0.9M contract and the team's spring activity signing new pass catchers and defensive bodies underscore that Fisk remains firmly outside the core offensive conversation. Without a dramatic camp performance or injury-driven circumstance, he figures to remain a roster filler in 2026, unlikely to shift the needle in either direction.
Tucker Fisk ranks 137th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Tucker between Tre Watson (D) just ahead and Joshua Simon (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Tre WatsonKansas City ChiefsDPatrick HerbertJacksonville JaguarsDDrake DabneyGreen Bay PackersDGraded lower
Joshua SimonAtlanta FalconsTucker Fisk's public perception sits firmly in negative territory heading into the 2026 season, and the D sentiment grade is less about active criticism than a near-total absence of narrative momentum. The media framing around Fisk is one of institutional indifference — beat reporters and analysts treat him as roster filler, rarely mentioning him in Chargers coverage, and his $0.9M contract signals plainly that the organization views him as a depth piece rather than a genuine weapon in the offensive scheme. That perception aligns squarely with his on-field production grade, which sits at D-, reflecting limited output in the 2025 season across 10 games and leaving virtually no footprint on opposing defensive coordinators or fantasy rosters. The Chargers' recent offseason activity — adding Kimani Vidal, Cole Strange, Tony Jefferson, Kayode Awosika, and Trey Lance in a flurry of spring signings — only further crowds the conversation and pushes Fisk further toward the margins of the public consciousness. At 27 and entering his fourth year, the developmental narrative is running thin, and without a breakout camp performance or an injury-driven opportunity, there is no compelling hook to shift the discourse in a positive direction. The bottom line is that Fisk exists in the "who?" category for most Chargers observers — not controversial enough to generate backlash, not productive enough to generate buzz, just quietly occupying a roster spot in a crowded offseason room.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Tucker Fisk is a player in his 2nd NFL season listed at TE for the Los Angeles Chargers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Tucker Fisk, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 1 |
| 9 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
D
2024
(30% weight)
D+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.