
#87 TE · Kansas City Chiefs
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'5"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
36
College
Cincinnati
Draft
2013, Rd 3, #63
Experience
13 yrs
TE Rank
#4 / 164
Grade Travis Kelce
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Travis Kelce grades out as an excellent TE for Kansas City Chiefs (A Performance). That places him 4th of 164 graded tight ends. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 13+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 191 | 1080 | 13,002 | 82 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 76 | 851 | 5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 97 | 823 | 3 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$12.0M
Guaranteed
$12.0M
AAV
$12.0M/yr
Travis Kelce delivered the kind of production that earns a B+ Contract Value Index relative to the TE pay band. His 2025 season totaled 851 receiving yards across 17 games—solid franchise-caliber output for a player in his mid-30s that justifies the organization's continued investment at $12M annual value. In the current tight end market, a veteran with Hall-of-Fame career credentials and proven durability commands premium dollars, but Kelce's one-year structure limits exposure and aligns with Kansas City's evident competitive-window thinking: the recent signings of L'Jarius Sneed, cornerbacks, and receivers signal a front office still building to compete, not managing decline. At 36 years old in his 13th season, Kelce occupies a rare air—a longtime veteran whose organizational standing remains genuinely elite, as evidenced by his return to mandatory minicamp on schedule and his active mentoring role with younger tight ends, per recent observations. The media narrative carries no whispers of depreciation or locker room discord; instead, the framing centers on his Hall-of-Fame trajectory and the Chiefs' continued faith in him as a cornerstone player rather than a placeholder. One year at $12M poses minimal long-term cap risk, and the absence of guaranteed money concerns reflects realistic late-career deal architecture. This contract represents fair value for a production-tested veteran whose reputation and organizational trust remain durable.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Travis's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Travis Kelce remains one of the NFL's premier tight ends at 36 years old, entering his 13th season as Kansas City's offensive cornerstone and a future Hall of Famer. The veteran has posted an A-grade performance this season despite natural age-related regression, continuing to deliver impact production in Patrick Mahomes' high-octane system. His body of work—191 games and over a decade of elite consistency—establishes him as a generational talent whose current-season metrics, while solid, undersell his historical dominance. This season, Kelce is averaging 11.2 yards per reception, well above the 9.19 NFL average and approaching elite territory at 15.89 yards. His 50.1 receiving yards per game ranks in the elite range, far exceeding the 10.67 league benchmark, demonstrating sustained volume and efficiency even in his mid-30s. At 0.29 touchdown receptions per game, he's above average in the red zone—outpacing the 0.13 NFL mean—though not quite reaching the 0.47 elite threshold, reflecting selective usage rather than diminished skill. The progression from a B- season in 2024 to a B+ in 2025 suggests stabilization and renewed focus after a brief dip. Kelce's ceiling remains high given his intelligence, positioning, and rapport with Mahomes, but durability and snap counts will be the primary variables to monitor. If the Chiefs maintain confidence in his availability, he could sustain current production through 2025. Monitor his role in the playoff push closely; championship infrastructure typically keeps future Hall of Famers engaged when it matters most.
Travis Kelce ranks 4th of 164 graded tight ends by performance. That slots Travis between George Kittle (A+) just ahead and Mark Andrews (A-) just behind.
Graded higher
George KittleSan Francisco 49ersA+Brock BowersLas Vegas RaidersATrey McbrideArizona CardinalsAGraded lower
Mark AndrewsBaltimore RavensKelce extension keeps the Chiefs' elite tight end locked in during his prime years. Media fixates on retirement rumors and Taylor Swift gossip rather than football merit. His ninth-place PFF ranking undersells a legitimately All-Pro performer still operating at high level. Fans debate his longevity, but his on-field production remains undeniable and valuable. Kansas City secures a cornerstone weapon for deep playoff runs ahead.
1 yr / $12.0M ($12.0M gtd)
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Travis Kelce is a veteran in his 13th NFL season listed at TE for the Kansas City Chiefs. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Travis Kelce, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance A, Sentiment B.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 93 |
| 984 |
| 5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 110 | 1,338 | 12 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 16 | 92 | 1,125 | 9 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 15 | 105 | 1,416 | 11 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 97 | 1,229 | 5 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 103 | 1,336 | 10 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 15 | 83 | 1,038 | 8 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 85 | 1,125 | 4 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 16 | 72 | 875 | 5 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 16 | 67 | 862 | 5 |
| 2013 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — |
Updated Jul 5, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B+
2025
(50% weight)
B-
2024
(30% weight)
B+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.