
#93 DT · New York Giants
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'2"
Weight
305 lbs
Age
32
College
Southern Miss
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
11 yrs
DT Rank
#68 / 218
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 142 | 9.0 | 233 | 27.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 9 | 3.0 | 23 | 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 15 | 2.0 | 52 | 3 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 16 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$300K
AAV
$1.3M/yr
This signing grades out as a slight overpay for the New York Giants — the team is getting approximately what they're paying for in on-field production. Rakeem's on-field performance ranks in the bottom quartile among NFL DTs, grading him as an unproven at the position. His $1.3M average annual value ranks as bargain money for the DT market. The production lines up closely with the price tag — unproven production at bargain money, which is essentially paying fair market value. Rakeem is squarely in his prime, which adds to the deal's upside — the team should get multiple productive seasons out of this contract. The 1-year, $1.3M deal ($300K guaranteed, 23%) keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Rakeem Nunez-Roches' D+ grade reflects his role as a veteran defensive tackle providing depth for the Giants' interior line. The journeyman has made a career out of being a reliable run-stuffer who can hold up at the point of attack and eat blocks for his linebackers. His D+ is fair for a player who does the unglamorous work without generating splash plays or pass-rush production. Nunez-Roches' experience and professionalism keep him employed, even if the on-field impact is limited. New York's defensive line needs more disruptive talent, and Nunez-Roches is a stopgap rather than a solution. He's the kind of veteran depth piece every team needs but nobody celebrates.
The media narrative around Rakeem Nunez-Roches paints him as a serviceable veteran addition, but this D- sentiment grade reveals the public's lukewarm reception to what amounts to a predictable depth signing. While outlets frame his return to Tampa Bay as bringing "proven NFL experience" and "scheme familiarity," the harsh reality is that fans and analysts view this as the type of low-ceiling move that signals organizational complacency rather than meaningful roster improvement. The emphasis on his being a "quality rotation player" essentially confirms he's viewed as replacement-level talent—functional enough to fill snaps but unlikely to elevate the unit's performance. Despite the positive spin about "bolstering interior depth," the D- grade suggests most observers see this as Tampa Bay settling for mediocrity rather than pursuing impact talent. This type of reunion signing typically generates more indifference than excitement, and the sentiment data confirms that perception holds true for Nunez-Roches.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.5 |
| 26 |
| 2 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 17 | 2.0 | 33 | 7.5 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 17 | 6 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 20 | 0 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 9 | 1 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 3 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 16 | 0.5 | 24 | 1 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 11 | 1.0 | 23 | 4 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 7 | 0.0 | 4 | 0 |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)