
#72 DT · Buffalo Bills
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
312 lbs
Age
28
Draft
2022, Rd 2, #47
Experience
4 yrs
DT Rank
#146 / 216
Grade Phidarian Mathis
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Phidarian Mathis grades out as a shaky DT for Buffalo Bills (D+ Performance). That places him 146th of 216 graded defensive tackles. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 28 | — | 38 | 4 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 6 | 0.0 | 13 | 0.5 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 12 | 0.0 | 17 | 3.5 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 10 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.2M
Guaranteed
$25K
AAV
$1.2M/yr
Phidarian Mathis drew a C- on the Contract Value Index — a calibrated read on Buffalo's cap allocation at defensive tackle. At $1.195M AAV on a one-year rookie deal, Mathis represents the kind of minimal financial commitment that makes sense for a fourth-year player fighting for his roster spot; the Bills are essentially betting that a fresh environment and another developmental opportunity will unlock value from a former second-round pick (2022, Round 2, Pick 47). His 2025 season: 13 tackles, 6 games illustrates limited production in a reserve role, which explains the D+ performance grade and underscores why Buffalo isn't overpaying for upside here. At 27 years old and four seasons into his career, Mathis is squarely in prove-it territory—too old to be purely developmental, too unproven to command market rate—and the one-year structure reflects that reality without locking the Bills into a long-term commitment. Media framing positions this as a low-risk flyer on a reclamation project with rotational snaps available behind the team's established defensive tackle rotation, and fan sentiment leans cautiously optimistic on the depth-building value, which aligns with the C- index grade: a contract that avoids disaster but offers minimal upside at the position.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Phidarian's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Phidarian Mathis grades a D+ performance mark, with his Pro Bowl-caliber stretches anchoring the read. A fourth-year defensive tackle competing for rotational depth snaps, Mathis produced 13 tackles across 6 games in the 2025 season—a limited counting-stat profile reflective of his reserve role behind Buffalo's established interior defensive line. His tackle output represents his primary statistical contribution, though the modest volume underscores minimal opportunity and a depth-piece role rather than a starter's workload. Durability remains a concern; with only six appearances, Mathis has not yet demonstrated the availability needed to anchor meaningful snaps in a full season, and his D+ grade reflects inconsistent performance when called upon. The media narrative frames him as a low-risk reclamation project on a practice-squad-to-contract path—a former second-round pick (2022, No. 47) attempting to salvage his career trajectory in Buffalo's scheme. His re-signing on a one-year deal signals the Bills view him as developmental depth with upside potential rather than an immediate rotation upgrade, a measured bet on a player still searching for consistency in his fourth year.
Phidarian Mathis ranks 146th of 216 graded defensive tackles by performance. That slots Phidarian between Ben Stille (D+) just ahead and Coziah Izzard (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Ben StilleAtlanta FalconsD+David OlajigaBaltimore RavensD+Jordan ElliottTennessee TitansD+Graded lower
Coziah IzzardNew Orleans SaintsThe public perception of Phidarian Mathis's situation with the Buffalo Bills reflects measured optimism about a reclamation project with limited downside. Media outlets have framed his return as a "low-risk flyer" on a former second-round pick, emphasizing the Bills' strategic approach to adding depth without significant financial commitment. The narrative consistently highlights Mathis as a developmental piece who has shown enough promise on the practice squad to warrant another opportunity in Buffalo's defensive tackle rotation. Fans appear to view this move favorably, seeing it as smart roster construction that provides potential upside while competing for rotational snaps behind the Bills' established defensive front. The sentiment suggests cautious confidence that Mathis could salvage his career trajectory in an environment where he's already demonstrated some progress. Overall, the C+ grade reflects a perception of Mathis as a depth contributor with untapped potential rather than a significant impact player, but one whose presence adds value to Buffalo's defensive depth chart.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Phidarian Mathis is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at DT for the Buffalo Bills. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Phidarian Mathis, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance D+, Sentiment C+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 1 | — | — | — |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
D-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.