
WR · San Francisco 49ers
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'5"
Weight
231 lbs
Age
32
College
Texas A&M
Draft
2014, Rd 1, #7
Experience
12 yrs
WR Rank
#7 / 300
Grade Mike Evans
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Mike Evans grades out as an excellent WR for San Francisco 49ers (A Performance). That places him 7th of 300 graded wide receivers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it good value (B+), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is positive (B+ Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. With 12+ seasons of track record, these grades rest on a deep sample.
| Year | Team | GP | Rec | Yards | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 176 | 866 | 13,052 | 108 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 8 | 30 | 368 | 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 14 | 74 | 1,004 | 11 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 17 |
Length
3 years
Total Value
$42.4M
Guaranteed
$16.3M
AAV
$14.1M/yr
Mike Evans' value math nets a B+ Contract Value Index — placing the deal in a clear band relative to the league median at wide receiver. At $14.1M AAV over three years, this is a veteran-minimum-adjacent contract for a 32-year-old receiver coming off a limited 2025 season (368 receiving yards across 8 games), which explains the measured grade despite his elite on-field performance rating. The salary sits well below star-receiver territory, reflecting both his age and the fact that this is a complementary addition rather than a marquee signing — a realistic market calibration for an established veteran in the back nine of his career. Evans' 12 seasons of production and Pro Bowl pedigree carry genuine credibility, and the 49ers' organizational confidence in his fit within Kyle Shanahan's system (as evidenced by internal endorsements) is reflected in the media's unanimously bullish framing around Super Bowl contention. The three-year term presents manageable risk given his veteran floor and the team's apparent win-now posture, though the CVI grade appropriately avoids inflating the deal based on narrative hype alone — this is a smart, pragmatic acquisition at a fair price, not a transformative value steal. The B+ lands exactly where it should: a solid complementary piece signed to a reasonable contract, neither overpaying for upside nor underselling a proven veteran's remaining productive window.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Mike's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Mike Evans, a 12-year veteran and one of the NFL's most durable perimeter threats, has delivered consistent excellence across his storied career with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before his recent move to San Francisco. The 32-year-old wideout carries an A grade into this season, reflecting his sustained ability to impact games despite entering the twilight of his career. Among established receivers in the league, Evans remains a high-volume, high-efficiency option who has proven he can thrive in multiple offensive systems. Evans's current campaign showcases both the strengths and vulnerabilities of an aging star. He's generating 46.0 receiving yards per game, well above the NFL average of 18.39, while his 12.3 yards per reception sits right at the league mean of 12.13, indicating consistent separation and catch radius. More impressively, his 0.38 touchdown receptions per game exceeds the NFL average of 0.18, demonstrating he remains a red-zone weapon. However, his season trajectory has dipped slightly to a C+ this year after posting an A- grade in 2024, suggesting some decline in overall contribution relative to his recent form. The question moving forward centers on whether Evans can stabilize his performance or continue trending downward as he approaches mid-thirties. His elite career body of work—a 12-season resume built on consistency and durability—insulates him from overreacting to one modest campaign. If he can return closer to his 2023-2024 level, Evans remains a viable WR2 or complementary option; anything lower would signal the beginning of the end for this future Hall of Fame candidate.
Mike Evans ranks 7th of 300 graded wide receivers by performance. That slots Mike between AJ Brown (A) just ahead and Puka Nacua (A) just behind.
Graded higher
AJ BrownNew England PatriotsADavante AdamsLos Angeles RamsANico CollinsHouston TexansAGraded lower
Puka NacuaLos Angeles RamsA49ers add proven veteran receiver talent to compete immediately in crowded NFC West. Five positive headlines suggest strong media confidence in Evans' fit within Shanahan's system. Evans' All-Pro pedigree provides legitimate upgrade over previous receiving corps depth. Fans debate whether aging star can maintain production under Kyle Shanahan's demanding scheme. San Francisco's championship window makes this a calculated gamble on established excellence.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Mike Evans is a veteran in his 12th NFL season listed at WR for the San Francisco 49ers. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Mike Evans, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B+, Performance A, Sentiment B+.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 79 |
| 1,255 |
| 13 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 77 | 1,124 | 6 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 16 | 74 | 1,035 | 14 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 70 | 1,006 | 13 |
| 2019 | ![]() | 13 | 67 | 1,157 | 8 |
| 2018 | ![]() | 16 | 86 | 1,524 | 8 |
| 2017 | ![]() | 15 | 71 | 1,001 | 5 |
| 2016 | ![]() | 16 | 96 | 1,321 | 12 |
| 2015 | ![]() | 15 | 74 | 1,206 | 3 |
| 2014 | ![]() | 15 | 68 | 1,051 | 12 |
Updated Jul 23, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C+
2025
(50% weight)
A-
2024
(30% weight)
A
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.