Lucas Scott

Current Contract

Contract Value Index (CVI)

The Ravens secured solid value with Lucas Scott's modest $0.9M deal, earning a C+ CVI that reflects smart roster management at fullback. While Scott's production tier remains unclear, Baltimore invested minimal resources in a position that's increasingly specialized in today's NFL, keeping their financial exposure low while addressing depth needs. At just $900K annually on a short-term commitment, this represents the kind of low-risk flyer that contending teams can afford to take on complementary players. The one-year structure gives both sides flexibility — Scott can prove his worth for a bigger payday while the Ravens avoid long-term obligations at a position where usage can fluctuate dramatically based on offensive philosophy. This is textbook roster building for a franchise-caliber organization like Baltimore, using spare salary cap space to cover their bases without compromising their ability to retain core talent or pursue impact players at premium positions.

Contracts in the Same Value Band

Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Lucas's contract sits relative to comparable money.

Performance Analysis

Lucas Scott is a replacement-level fullback for the Baltimore Ravens, and after just three games in his rookie season, there is not enough of a track record to establish any meaningful performance baseline. His $0.9M contract tells the whole story of where he sits on the roster — this is a depth piece, not a featured contributor, and his usage through three games reflects exactly that standing. The fullback position is already one of the most marginalized in modern NFL offenses, and Scott has done nothing in his limited sample to separate himself from that anonymity. As the mediaFraming makes clear, he operates as a functional role player in Baltimore's run-heavy system — reliable in the sense that he is present, but not impactful enough to generate any meaningful analyst attention or fan discussion. For a 22-year-old rookie who entered the league as an undrafted free agent, the developmental runway exists, but the D+ performance grade reflects a player who has not yet demonstrated the on-field value to justify even a modest expanded role. Baltimore's offseason activity — adding weapons and depth at multiple positions — suggests the organizational focus remains elsewhere, and Scott will need to do something genuinely notable in training camp and preseason to change the narrative heading into 2026.

Current Sentiment

Lucas Scott's public perception sits at a D grade — appropriately reflecting the reality of being an undrafted depth fullback in a league that has largely moved on from the position. The national media has virtually no footprint on Scott, and that absence itself tells the story: without standout blocking performances or goal-line moments generating headlines, he remains a peripheral figure operating well outside mainstream NFL discourse. That muted perception aligns closely with his D+ performance grade on the field, where three games played in the 2025 season speak to a role defined by depth and functional value rather than meaningful offensive involvement. Baltimore's recent offseason activity — signing veterans like Calais Campbell and adding developmental pieces at quarterback, receiver, and the defensive line — only further marginalizes Scott's profile, as the organizational spotlight naturally gravitates toward those higher-profile additions. At $0.9M AAV, he carries the unmistakable signature of a reserve contributor, and until something changes dramatically on the field or in Baltimore's depth chart, the narrative surrounding Lucas Scott figures to remain exactly where it is: quiet, neutral, and largely irrelevant to the broader conversation.