
#92 LB · New York Giants
2 transactions this offseason
Height
6'4"
Weight
255 lbs
Age
28
College
Notre Dame
Draft
2020, Rd 5, #147
Experience
4 yrs
LB Rank
#227 / 338
Grade Khalid Kareem
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Khalid Kareem grades out as a shaky LB for New York Giants (D+ Performance). That places him 227th of 338 graded linebackers. Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | 34 | 41 | 1.0 | — | |
| 2025 | ![]() | 4 | 7 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 2 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 | 1 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.2M
AAV
$1.2M/yr
This signing grades out as an overpay for the New York Giants — the team is paying more than the on-field production currently warrants. Khalid's on-field performance ranks in the lower half among NFL LBs, grading him as a rotational player at the position. His $1.2M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the LB market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — rotational player output at minimum-level money means the team is paying a premium above the player's on-field value. Khalid is squarely in his prime, which adds to the deal's upside — the team should get multiple productive seasons out of this contract. The 1-year, $1.2M deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Khalid's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Among linebackers on the New York Giants, Khalid Kareem's output grades to a D+ performance level. The 28-year-old veteran is operating as depth-roster machinery — a rotational, scheme-dependent edge presence whose modest 2025 season production of 7 tackles across 4 games reflects the narrow playing-time window afforded to complementary defenders in an underperforming defensive scheme. His tackle for loss represents the only flash of impact-level work in an otherwise forgettable slate, underscoring a player whose ceiling is situational rather than foundational. At six years in the league and drafted in the fifth round out of a limited college pedigree, Kareem has never developed into a consistent contributor; his career-long resume of sparse sacks and forced fumbles confirms what the current data suggests: he operates as a depth rotation piece dependent on injury elevation rather than earned opportunity. The Giants' recent addition of him fits the organizational posture of a 4-13 roster scrambling for warm bodies along the defensive front, and his path forward remains tethered to training camp performance and preseason tape rather than any meaningful expectation of expanded role. Absent a dramatic scheme shift or cascade of injuries, Kareem's role will remain what it has always been — a practice-squad-adjacent veteran providing organizational depth with no realistic projection into fantasy relevance or playoff-rotation impact.
Khalid Kareem ranks 227th of 338 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Khalid between Nick Martin (D+) just ahead and Andrew Farmer (D+) just behind.
Graded higher
Nick MartinSan Francisco 49ersD+Jihad WardTennessee TitansD+Ezekiel TurnerFree AgentD+Graded lower
Andrew FarmerSan Francisco 49ersKhalid Kareem's sentiment grade lands at C, reflecting how the recent storylines have framed him. The 28-year-old, six-year veteran has generated minimal buzz around his Giants signing—the media narrative amounts to straightforward roster-transaction coverage across five sources, with headlines that read as administrative notices rather than meaningful analysis or fan interest. The framing projects him as a solid contributor in a depth role, yet his 2025 season production of 7 tackles across 4 games combined with a D+ performance grade underscore that he's anchoring the organizational margins, not moving the competitive needle. With the Giants themselves sitting at 4-13 and sentiment across the organization cooling sharply downward, there's no team-level goodwill or narrative momentum to elevate a fringe linebacker's profile—he arrived quietly, is expected to contribute modestly, and will cycle in and out based purely on injury necessity. Kareem embodies the unsexy machinery of NFL roster construction: the kind of depth piece every team needs but fans and media never get behind, and nothing in the current headline landscape suggests that perception is about to shift.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Khalid Kareem is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at LB for the New York Giants. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Khalid Kareem, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance D+, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.0 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 4 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 7 | 9 | 0.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 16 | 19 | 1.0 | 0 |
Updated May 23, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
C
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.