
#58 LB · Minnesota Vikings
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'3"
Weight
259 lbs
Age
29
College
Florida
Draft
2020, Rd 3, #90
Experience
6 yrs
LB Rank
#71 / 339
Grade Jonathan Greenard
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jonathan Greenard grades out as a strong LB for Minnesota Vikings (B Performance). That places him 71st of 339 graded linebackers. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it fairly priced (C-), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is very positive (A- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Tkl | Sacks | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 78 | 217 | 38.0 | 1 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 12 | 38 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 59 | 12.0 | 0 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$60.0M
Guaranteed
$50.0M
AAV
$30.0M/yr
Salary-cap math on Jonathan Greenard's contract works out to a C- Contract Value Index given the dead-cap exposure and term. At $30M AAV over four years, Greenard is being compensated at a level typically reserved for elite pass rushers or franchise-caliber defensive anchors—a tier he does not consistently occupy. His 2025 season production of 38 tackles and 3 sacks across 12 games reflects a solid-starter profile: reliable, professional, and productive enough to justify a roster spot, but lacking the dominant pressure metrics or tackle-for-loss frequency that would command premium dollars. The real tension in this deal is the gap between his compensation and his positional scarcity: the market for edge rushers and linebackers with proven NFL experience is robust, but Greenard's $30M AAV positions him as a centerpiece rather than a complementary piece, which is a structural mismatch. Minnesota's recent pivots—releasing multiple receivers, signing depth linebackers like Jake Golday, and bringing in defensive line help at Isaiahh Loudermilk—underscore that the Vikings viewed Greenard as replaceable enough to trade for multiple draft picks, a decision that ESPN-driven criticism has called into question but that also validates the organization's assessment that his contract was better allocated elsewhere. The four-year term compounds the concern, locking the Eagles into escalating cap commitments to a player whose production has been consistent but not explosive, making this a contract that earns fair value only if he significantly elevates his play in Philadelphia's scheme.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Jonathan's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jonathan Greenard is a six-year veteran linebacker who has become a steady run-defense anchor for Minnesota's defense. At 29, he brings experience and consistency to the middle, though he operates as a role player rather than a star-tier defender. His B-grade reflects a competent, starting-caliber linebacker who excels in specific areas while remaining limited elsewhere. Greenard's standout metric is his tackle-for-loss rate of 0.88 per game, ranking elite among NFL linebackers against the 0.27 average. His sack production at 0.25 per game also exceeds the league standard of 0.15, indicating he generates meaningful disruption in the backfield. However, his tackle volume of 3.17 per game, while above the 2.19 NFL average, pales against elite defenders who routinely exceed 7.0, and his pass defense coverage remains pedestrian at 0.25 per game. These numbers paint a picture of a run-stopping specialist without elite range or coverage ability. Greenard's trajectory shows modest improvement this season with a B-minus grade, up from C-plus in 2023, suggesting he's found better fit or conditioning within Minnesota's scheme. His production remains front-loaded in the trenches, where his penetration and discipline shine brightest. Going forward, monitor whether he can sustain this upward trend or if age and mileage begin limiting his effectiveness against the pass—a critical skill for modern linebackers navigating spread offenses and space.
Jonathan Greenard ranks 71st of 339 graded linebackers by performance. That slots Jonathan between Henry To'oto'o (B) just ahead and Cole Holcomb (B) just behind.
Graded higher
Henry To'oto'oHouston TexansBCody BartonTennessee TitansBKenneth Murray Jr.Free AgentBGraded lower
Cole HolcombPittsburgh SteelersPhiladelphia made a bold defensive investment with Greenard, addressing edge rush needs decisively. Five major headlines spotlight optimism about his 2026 impact and pairing potential. The $100M commitment signals genuine belief he'll elevate their pass rush immediately. Fans debate whether this move finally solves Philadelphia's long-standing edge rusher problem. Greenard's production will determine if this aggressive spending translates into playoff success.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jonathan Greenard is a player in his 6th NFL season listed at LB for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jonathan Greenard, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C-, Performance B, Sentiment A-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 52 |
| 12.5 |
| 0 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 8 | 16 | 1.5 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 13 | 33 | 8.0 | 0 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 13 | 19 | 1.0 | 0 |
Updated Aug 2, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
B-
2025
(50% weight)
B-
2024
(30% weight)
C+
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.