
#39 S · Detroit Lions
Height
5'10"
Weight
202 lbs
Age
27
College
Arkansas
Draft
Undrafted
S Rank
#194 / 196
Grade Jessie Bates
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Jessie Bates grades out as a poor S for Detroit Lions (F Performance). That places him 194th of 196 graded safeties. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at F, a significant overpay. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | INT | PD | Tkl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 34 | — | — | 6 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 1 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.1M
Guaranteed
$36.0M
AAV
$1.1M/yr
Net of age, position, and term, Jessie Bates's deal earns a F Contract Value Index. At $1.075M AAV on a one-year contract, the salary floor is low enough to absorb without cap strain, but the performance grade tells the real story: the 2025 season yielded just 4 tackles across 17 games, a production line that screams replacement-level contributor rather than impact defensive back. For a 27-year-old safety in his third NFL season, that output is the opposite of what you want to see at a position where veteran free agents typically command respect through either ball-hawking ability or sideline-to-sideline range—neither of which materialize in his statistical footprint. The media narrative, while not hostile, makes clear he operates as a complementary piece to his defensive partner rather than a centerpiece, with individual recognition conspicuously absent from top-tier player rankings despite team-level praise for the secondary unit as a whole. Detroit's recent secondary additions signal the front office is building depth around this group rather than anchoring the position to Bates, which further reinforces that this is a prove-it year on a short leash rather than a role secured by pedigree or past performance. On a one-year deal at this salary, there's minimal downside risk to the organization, but there's also nothing in his contract profile or on-field production to suggest he's earning anything better than a bargain basement CVI grade.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Jessie's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Jessie Bates receives an F grade that appears to reflect a data mix-up, as his stats show kicker-like numbers (field goal percentage and points) rather than safety production for a player listed at the position. Across 34 games with Detroit and Houston, the statistical profile is unclear, and the F grade may not accurately represent his actual defensive contributions. The two consecutive 17-game seasons in Detroit suggest consistent availability, which is always valued. Without clean defensive statistics, it is difficult to provide a comprehensive assessment of Bates' contributions to the Lions' defense. The grade should be viewed with the understanding that the underlying data may not fully capture his true impact.
Jessie Bates ranks 194th of 196 graded safeties by performance. That slots Jessie between Jl Skinner (D-) just ahead and Chris Smith Ii (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Jl SkinnerDenver BroncosD-Joey BlountArizona CardinalsFSanoussi KaneTennessee TitansFGraded lower
Chris Smith IiNew York JetsFJessie Bates carries a B- public perception heading into the 2026 season — steady enough to avoid criticism, but not strong enough to generate genuine buzz. The dominant narrative shaping his profile is a collective one: Detroit's safety tandem has earned real praise for what it has accomplished as a unit, but when cameras zoom in on individual credit, Kerby Joseph is the one collecting top-75 player recognition while Bates operates comfortably in the background. That dynamic aligns precisely with his on-field profile — a F performance grade confirms that splash-play production, the kind that fuels individual rankings and highlight packages, has been essentially absent, with the 2025 season yielding just 4 tackles across 17 games, a counting-stat line that screams quiet complementary piece rather than impact defender. Detroit's offseason activity — adding Chuck Clark, Avonte Maddox, and others to the defensive back room — subtly signals that the front office is building depth around this secondary rather than treating any single piece as untouchable, which does little to elevate Bates's individual standing in the conversation. The bottom line is that Bates's narrative sits in a comfortable but uninspiring neutral zone: he benefits from being part of a well-regarded tandem in a respected defense, but without individual accolades or statistical moments to anchor his own story, public perception follows the team's success rather than his name.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Jessie Bates is a player on the Detroit Lions roster listed at S for the Detroit Lions. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Jessie Bates, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance F, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| — |
| — |
| — |
Updated Jun 12, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
F
2025
(50% weight)
F
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.