
#92 DT · Minnesota Vikings
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'7"
Weight
293 lbs
Age
28
College
Wisconsin
Draft
2021, Rd 5, #156
Experience
5 yrs
DT Rank
#211 / 216
Grade Isaiahh Loudermilk
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Isaiahh Loudermilk grades out as a poor DT for Minnesota Vikings (F Performance). That places him 211th of 216 graded defensive tackles. Against that production, his deal reads as a slight overpay on the Contract Value Index (D) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Sacks | Tkl | TFL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 58 | 1.0 | 63 | 5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2024 | ![]() | 16 | 0.0 | 17 | 1 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 16 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.2M
AAV
$1.2M/yr
Minnesota Vikings got a D Contract Value Index out of the Isaiahh Loudermilk signing because the guaranteed money matches the production tier. At $1.215M AAV on a one-year deal, this is a low-cost depth addition—exactly what you'd expect to pay for a rotational defensive tackle with minimal upside. Loudermilk appeared in 2 games during the 2025 season, a stark reflection of his F performance grade and five-year veteran status without a clear role beyond backup insurance. The defensive tackle market has moved decisively toward elite or cost-controlled youth; a 28-year-old journeyman with a fifth-round pedigree (2021) and a journeyman trajectory offers neither. The Vikings framed this correctly as pragmatic squad-building rather than a pass-rush upgrade—the media consensus is uniform on that point—but at his age and production level, Loudermilk carries no negotiating leverage or narrative momentum to justify anything above depth-piece compensation. With only one year of runway and the Steelers' recent shift away from him at the defensive line, this is a low-risk, low-reward commitment that won't move Minnesota's competitive needle either direction.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Isaiahh's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Isaiahh Loudermilk delivers production that earns a F performance grade against DT comps. At 28 years old and five seasons into his career as a 5th-round developmental pick, Loudermilk has failed to carve out a meaningful role in Pittsburgh's defensive line rotation, and his move to Minnesota signals a clear demotion to depth-piece status rather than any meaningful upgrade to the Vikings' front. The 2025 season saw him limited to 2 games, which underscores both durability concerns and a complete lack of snap opportunity — the kind of marginal involvement that defines a fringe roster contributor. His career sack total remains negligible, a glaring absence that reflects a fundamental inability to generate the kind of disruptive plays expected from even rotational NFL defensive linemen. The mediaFraming pegs him accurately: a former Steelers contributor offered up as rotational depth rather than starter potential, and Pittsburgh's recent signings of Dean Lowry and other defensive line reinforcements make clear the organization has already moved on. At this stage of his career and with his current production level, Loudermilk is fighting for a back-end roster spot — Minnesota's signing provides a shot at proving he can sustain a role, but nothing in his track record suggests a reversal of fortune is imminent.
Isaiahh Loudermilk ranks 211th of 216 graded defensive tackles by performance. That slots Isaiahh between Mckinnley Jackson (D-) just ahead and Ty Hamilton (F) just behind.
Graded higher
Mckinnley JacksonCincinnati BengalsD-Jay TufeleDetroit LionsFCam JacksonCarolina PanthersFGraded lower
Ty HamiltonLos Angeles RamsMinnesota Vikings fans and writers have settled into a C sentiment grade on Isaiahh Loudermilk. The narrative around him is defined by pragmatism rather than excitement: media coverage frames him as a depth addition from Pittsburgh rather than a prospect with upside, with all five headlines confirming the signing with minimal fanfare and no indication he's viewed as a transformative pass-rush piece. His F performance grade aligns perfectly with the muted tone—five seasons into his career after a 5th-round 2021 draft selection, and he's produced rotational depth at best. The Lions visit last offseason read more like due diligence than a bidding war, and Pittsburgh's recent roster moves at the defensive line (including the acquisitions of players like Jamin Davis and Robert Tonyan) make it clear the Steelers have already pivoted away from him. At 28, with limited runway to reinvent himself, Loudermilk remains firmly in journeyman territory—a squad-building depth piece with no narrative momentum and nothing on the horizon to change that perception.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Isaiahh Loudermilk is a player in his 5th NFL season listed at DT for the Minnesota Vikings. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Isaiahh Loudermilk, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance F, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.0 |
| 16 |
| 1.5 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 11 | 0.0 | 7 | 1 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 15 | 1.0 | 23 | 1.5 |
Updated Jun 6, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
C-
2025
(50% weight)
F
2024
(30% weight)
F
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.