
RB · Seattle Seahawks
1 transaction this offseason
Height
5'10"
Weight
226 lbs
Age
27
College
Fort Valley State
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
3 yrs
RB Rank
#78 / 176
Grade Emanuel Wilson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Emanuel Wilson grades out as a middling RB for Seattle Seahawks (C Performance). That places him 78th of 176 graded running backs. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at C, fairly priced. The public read is sharply negative (F Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | Yards | TD | YPC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 41 | 1,083 | 7 | 4.5 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 17 | 496 | 3 | 4.0 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 17 | 502 | 4 | 4.9 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 7 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.6M
Guaranteed
$550K
AAV
$1.6M/yr
Earning a C Contract Value Index, Emanuel Wilson's 1-year pact reflects how Seattle valued the running back market heading into 2026. The disconnect between his media narrative and his actual production is stark: Wilson logged 99 receiving yards across 17 games in the 2025 season, a replacement-level output that sits squarely at odds with the "best-value starter" framing circulating in some corners of the coverage. At $1.595M annually, the deal is cheap enough that Seattle absorbs minimal risk, which is precisely why this contract grades as middle-of-the-road rather than exceptional — the salary cushions organizational flexibility, but Wilson's recent on-field performance doesn't yet justify the optimistic noise. As a third-year player at 27, Wilson sits in a prove-it window; the media enthusiasm suggests he's being viewed as a buy-low talent rather than a proven commodity, a bet on potential upside rather than established production. The Seahawks, sitting atop the NFC at 14-3 heading into the regular season, appear to be operating with confidence in their roster construction, and this low-cost depth move fits a team comfortable taking calculated position-market gambles. If Wilson earns genuine starting snaps and produces accordingly, this contract could age into a value play within a season — but right now, the CVI reflects the reality: it's a low-dollar flyer priced for depth, not a bargain because the player has already proven his worth.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Emanuel's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Emanuel Wilson is a three-year veteran running back for the Seattle Seahawks who has appeared in 41 career games as a complementary back. At 27 years old, Wilson occupies a depth role in the league and grades as a C overall, reflecting inconsistent contributions and declining production trends. He represents a journeyman reserve rather than a core offensive piece or future centerpiece. Wilson's current season metrics reveal both modest efficiency and execution concerns. His 3.97 yards per carry sits slightly below the NFL average of 4.11, indicating he lacks explosiveness compared to league standards; elite backs average 6.49 yards per attempt. On a per-game basis, Wilson averages 29.2 rushing yards, which outpaces the NFL average of 22.39 but reflects volume rather than elite-level impact. His touchdown production of 0.18 per game trails the NFL average of 0.29 significantly, suggesting limited red-zone effectiveness and scoring upside—a critical weakness for a back at his experience level. Wilson's trajectory has drifted downward across three seasons, dropping from a C- grade in 2023 and 2024 to a D+ in 2025, signaling deteriorating performance rather than developmental growth. At age 27 with limited positional upside, he appears to have plateaued as a backup option. The Seahawks should evaluate whether Wilson merits continued roster investment or if youth development in the backfield offers better long-term value. Moving forward, Wilson must demonstrate renewed effectiveness in short-yardage situations and offensive efficiency to secure regular snaps.
Emanuel Wilson ranks 78th of 176 graded running backs by performance. That slots Emanuel between Kenneth Gainwell (C) just ahead and Tyjae Spears (C) just behind.
Graded higher
Kenneth GainwellTampa Bay BuccaneersCSincere McCormickSan Francisco 49ersCMichael WileyTampa Bay BuccaneersCGraded lower
Tyjae SpearsTennessee TitansSeattle's Wilson signing screams uncertainty—neither a clear upgrade nor a franchise cornerstone addition. Media skepticism dominates with five headlines questioning the move's merit immediately post-signing. The one-year deal structure suggests low commitment and hedged confidence in Wilson's fit. Fans debate whether Wilson fills a need or represents organizational indecision at running back. Expect Wilson competing for depth snaps unless early camp performance shifts Seattle's calculus dramatically.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Emanuel Wilson is a player in his 3rd NFL season listed at RB for the Seattle Seahawks. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Emanuel Wilson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C, Performance C, Sentiment F.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 85 |
| 0 |
| 6.1 |
Updated Jul 18, 2026
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D+
2025
(50% weight)
C-
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.