
#48 CB · Jacksonville Jaguars
2 transactions this offseason
Height
6'1"
Weight
233 lbs
Age
27
College
App State
Draft
2022, Rd 5, #161
Experience
4 yrs
CB Rank
#97 / 270
Grade Dane Jackson
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Dane Jackson grades out as a middling CB for Jacksonville Jaguars (C+ Performance). That places him 97th of 270 graded cornerbacks. Against that production, his deal reads as good value on the Contract Value Index (B-) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is positive (B- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | INT | PD | Tkl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 64 | 3 | 30 | 178 |
| 2025 | ![]() | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2024 | ![]() | 9 | 0 | 2 | 23 |
| 2023 | ![]() | 15 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.2M
AAV
$1.2M/yr
Dane Jackson delivered the kind of production that earns a B- Contract Value Index relative to the CB pay band. At $1.215M AAV on a one-year deal, Jacksonville is getting a sixth-year veteran on a prove-it contract that carries minimal financial risk and reflects realistic expectations for a depth cornerback in the mid-tier secondary market. Jackson's 2025 season production—3 tackles across 3 games—underscores his role as a reserve option rather than a high-impact starter, which aligns perfectly with what the Jaguars paid for. At 27 years old with six seasons of NFL experience under his belt, Jackson occupies the veteran depth archetype: a known commodity with professional seasoning who can fill snaps without demanding starter money or guaranteed commitments. The media framing of this as a "modest roster reinforcement move" and "standard secondary addition" reflects the deal's fundamentals—this is incremental depth building, not a statement acquisition, and the contract structure respects that distinction. Jacksonville's approach here is sound: low-cost, short-term, no long-term cap entanglement, and flexibility to pivot if the secondary picture evolves during training camp and the preseason push toward their regular-season opener.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the B band — a quick read on where Dane's contract sits relative to comparable money.
How Dane Jackson plays at CB earns him a C+ performance grade. Jackson is a depth-caliber cornerback whose 2025 season production—3 tackles across 3 games—reflects the limited snaps and opportunity typical of a backup secondary role. His minimal counting stats underscore a core weakness: he hasn't established himself as a reliable starter or playmaker capable of commanding consistent target share. At 27 years old in his sixth year in the league, Jackson carries the pedigree of a veteran presence but lacks the on-field impact to elevate Jacksonville's secondary beyond reserve stability. The media narrative frames his signing to Jacksonville as straightforward depth building rather than a transformative upgrade, positioning him exactly where his tape and production align: a known commodity who can spell at cornerback when injuries or matchups demand rotation help. For a Jaguars team sitting at 13-4 with playoff positioning secured, Jackson represents the kind of low-risk, pragmatic roster reinforcement that addresses secondary depth without requiring the team to overcommit resources or expect star-level production.
Dane Jackson ranks 97th of 270 graded cornerbacks by performance. That slots Dane between Cam Lampkin (C+) just ahead and Myles Bryant (C+) just behind.
Graded higher
Cam LampkinLos Angeles RamsC+Terell SmithChicago BearsC+Roger MccrearyDetroit LionsC+Graded lower
Myles BryantCleveland BrownsThe talk around Dane Jackson this stretch nets a B- sentiment grade. Media coverage frames his signing to Jacksonville as a straightforward secondary depth addition—a veteran cornerback brought in during offseason roster construction rather than a transformative move, with the Jaguars viewing him as a known commodity to shore up the cornerback room ahead of the regular season. Jackson's performance profile as a C+ on-field contributor aligns with that narrative: he's a reliable depth piece, not a difference-maker, which explains why the media and fanbase treat this as incremental roster reinforcement rather than headline news. The recent headlines painting his Buffalo tenure—cycling through releases and signings, limited production in 2025 with 3 tackles across 3 games—underscore that he's a journeyman secondary option who can be useful when called upon but hasn't earned long-term security anywhere. His B- grade reflects the public's pragmatic view: Jackson is the type of professional veteran presence teams cycle through during the grind of secondary construction, valued for reliability and experience more than impact, fitting neatly into Jacksonville's methodical approach to filling depth holes.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Dane Jackson is a player in his 4th NFL season listed at CB for the Jacksonville Jaguars. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Dane Jackson, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index B-, Performance C+, Sentiment B-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0 |
| 5 |
| 39 |
| 2022 | ![]() | 15 | 2 | 12 | 57 |
| 2021 | ![]() | 17 | 0 | 6 | 41 |
| 2020 | ![]() | 5 | 1 | 5 | 15 |
Updated Jan 1, 1970
Recent seasons are weighted more heavily in the overall performance grade.
D
2025
(50% weight)
D+
2024
(30% weight)
C-
2023
(20% weight)
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.