
#79 OT · Cincinnati Bengals
1 transaction this offseason
Height
6'7"
Weight
315 lbs
Age
25
College
TCU
Draft
Undrafted
Experience
1 yr
Grade Andrew Coker
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Andrew Coker grades out as a shaky OT for Cincinnati Bengals (D+ Performance). Against that production, his deal reads as fairly priced on the Contract Value Index (C+) — the team is paying below what the play would command. The public read is mixed (C- Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a pro, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
Total Value
$885K
AAV
$885K/yr
The Cincinnati Bengals secured solid value with Andrew Coker's $0.9M deal, earning a C+ CVI that represents fair compensation for a developmental offensive tackle prospect. At under $1M annually, this contract carries minimal financial risk while giving the Bengals a cost-controlled option to evaluate Coker's potential as depth or future starter material along their offensive line. The modest investment suggests Cincinnati views him as a project player who could develop into a serviceable contributor, though his current production likely places him in the backup or developmental tier. The low guaranteed money structure provides the team maximum flexibility to retain him if he progresses or move on without significant cap implications if he doesn't pan out. This is the type of shrewd, low-risk investment that successful franchises make to build depth — not a needle-moving signing, but smart roster construction that could pay dividends if Coker develops into a reliable swing tackle or eventual starter.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the C band — a quick read on where Andrew's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Andrew Coker is a first-year offensive tackle with the Cincinnati Bengals, an undrafted or late-round developmental prospect still searching for a foothold in one of the NFL's most demanding positions. With just five career games to his name, Coker sits firmly in the earliest stages of professional development — far short of the 16-game threshold that would begin to establish him as a reliable presence at the position. For an offensive lineman, availability is currency, and Coker has had precious little opportunity to build the kind of trust and continuity that coaches and quarterbacks depend on up front. His grade at this stage reflects the reality of a player who has yet to demonstrate sustained value at the NFL level, earning a D+ that speaks more to limited opportunity than necessarily a ceiling on his potential. The Bengals, protecting a franchise quarterback in Joe Burrow, require dependability and experience from every lineman on their depth chart, and Coker has not yet shown he can be counted on in meaningful stretches. What to watch moving forward is whether he can stay healthy, learn from a veteran room, and carve out a consistent role — even as a quality backup — because longevity and reliability will ultimately define whether he has a career in this league.
Andrew Coker ranks 83rd of 189 graded offensive tackles by performance. That slots Andrew between Kiran Amegadjie (D+) just ahead and Lorenz Metz (D) just behind.
Graded higher
Kiran AmegadjieChicago BearsD+Dj GlazeLas Vegas RaidersD+Charles GrantLas Vegas RaidersD+Graded lower
Lorenz MetzNew England PatriotsBeat coverage and fan boards are running roughly even on Andrew Coker, landing him at a C- sentiment grade. The prevailing narrative frames him as a developmental depth lineman in a competitive roster battle rather than a breakout prospect—media coverage is neutral and process-oriented, focusing on his challenge to secure a meaningful role on Cincinnati's depth chart rather than celebrating any meaningful breakthrough. His D+ performance grade, rooted in replacement-level production and limited opportunity, aligns squarely with that muted public perception; appearing in just three games in 2025, Coker remains a known organizational quantity but one commanding almost no outside attention. The Bengals' recent offseason activity—signings of defensive backs Tacario Davis and Ceyair Wright, edge rusher Cashius Howell, and run-game additions—has completely overshadowed Coker's situation, leaving him positioned as an afterthought in broader Cincinnati roster construction discussions. The reality is stark: Coker's narrative is stuck at the floor of relevance, a fringe practice squad name fighting to stay visible in an organization with far bigger priorities, and with 91 days until the regular season, his path to meaningful impact remains narrow and entirely contingent on standout training camp and preseason performance.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Andrew Coker is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at OT for the Cincinnati Bengals. FanVerdicts covers every NFL player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Andrew Coker, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index C+, Performance D+, Sentiment C-.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NFL game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NFL hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NFL player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.