
#3C · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'11"
Weight
250 lbs
Age
30
College
Texas
Experience
10 yrs
Wingspan
7'4.0"
Reach
9'4.0"
Hand Size
9.25" × 9.25"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 713 | 11.9 | 5.3 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 44.0% | 36.5% | 76.9% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 71 | 11.9 | 5.3 | 1.5 |
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 27 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 6-11 | 1-5 | +26 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs MEM | W 131-115 | 22 | 19 |
Length
4 years
Total Value
$108.9M
Guaranteed
$51.9M
AAV
$25.3M/yr
Myles Turner's four-year, $25.3M AAV deal with Milwaukee represents a textbook case of paying above-average money for middling production. The Contract Value Index (CVI) assigns Turner a C grade because his current performance level — a C+ across key defensive metrics and offensive efficiency — simply doesn't justify eating up nearly 20% of the salary cap for a center role. While Turner brings legitimate rim protection and three-point shooting versatility that fits modern NBA systems, his inconsistent rebounding and limited post presence make him more of a solid starter than the franchise-caliber anchor this contract suggests. Milwaukee essentially paid for Turner's ceiling rather than his floor, banking on defensive impact that hasn't consistently materialized at an elite level. The Bucks are getting functional production from their investment, but this deal looks like a slight overpay for a player who profiles more as a $20-22M complementary piece than a $25M+ cornerstone. Turner's contract grade reflects the disconnect between his actual on-court value and the premium Milwaukee committed to secure his services in a competitive market.
Myles Turner earns a C+ Performance grade, reflecting league-average production for a center. Through 713 games, Myles is contributing 11.9 points, 5.3 rebounds, and 1.5 assists per game in his role. Myles's strongest area is RPG at 5.3, which compares favorably to the center median of 5.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 1.5 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Myles ranks 30th.
No transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.7 |
| 1.6 |
| 44.0% |
| 38.3% |
| 74.0% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 72 | 15.6 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 48.1% | 39.6% | 77.3% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 77 | 17.1 | 6.9 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 52.4% | 35.8% | 77.3% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 62 | 18.0 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 54.8% | 37.3% | 78.3% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 42 | 12.9 | 7.1 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 50.9% | 33.3% | 75.2% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 47 | 12.6 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 3.4 | 47.7% | 33.5% | 78.2% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 62 | 12.1 | 6.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 45.7% | 34.4% | 75.1% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 74 | 13.3 | 7.2 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 48.7% | 38.8% | 73.6% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 65 | 12.7 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 47.9% | 35.7% | 77.7% |
| 2016-17 | ![]() | 81 | 14.5 | 7.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 51.1% | 34.8% | 80.9% |
| 2015-16 | ![]() | 60 | 10.3 | 5.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 49.8% | 21.4% | 72.7% |
| 11 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 6-13 |
| 1-4 |
| -3 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1-4 | 1-3 | -32 |
The public narrative around Myles Turner in Milwaukee has settled into a cautious, wait-and-see posture — a C+ sentiment grade that reflects genuine ambivalence rather than outright rejection, but is far from the warm reception an established veteran hopes for when joining a new organization. The dominant media framing has been defined less by what Turner brings and more by the questions swirling around him: at least one prominent outlet framed Indiana's decision to move on as sound roster management, a characterization that has meaningfully eroded his perceived value before he could build a new identity with Bucks fans. That skepticism is compounded by injury availability concerns, with Turner appearing on multiple injury reports during a stretch when Milwaukee could least afford it — and head coach Doc Rivers publicly calling out the team's health situation has only amplified the uncertainty around Turner specifically. His on-court production tells a more nuanced story: in the 2025-26 season, Turner appeared in 71 games and posted 11.9 PPG and 5.3 RPG, a solid-starter output that aligns with his C+ performance grade but falls short of the decisive, difference-making impact that would quiet the skeptics. The Bucks' organizational turbulence — a 32-50 record, a string of roster cuts and fringe signings, and no meaningful playoff positioning — has made it nearly impossible for any individual player to generate positive momentum, and Turner has been caught in that fog rather than rising above it. With the season effectively over and end-of-year retrospectives already circulating, the narrative around Turner right now is one of unresolved questions: is he a legitimate defensive anchor or a costly overpay? That answer still feels a long way off.