
#13C · Chicago Bulls
Height
6'11"
Weight
245 lbs
Age
28
College
Kentucky
Experience
5 yrs
Wingspan
7'2.3"
Reach
9'2.0"
Hand Size
9" × 9"
Grade this player:
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 305 | 5.8 | 5.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 51.2% | 26.1% | 72.4% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 48 | 5.8 | 5.1 | 0.3 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$5.0M
Guaranteed
$5.0M
AAV
$5.0M/yr
Nick Richards delivers exceptional value on his $5.0M AAV one-year deal with the Chicago Bulls, earning an elite A+ Contract Value Index (CVI) grade despite a D performance rating. The center's bargain-bin contract represents one of the league's most efficient salary allocations, as even replacement-level production at his price point creates massive positive value relative to market standards. Richards' deal sits well below the $8-12M range typically commanded by serviceable NBA centers, making his modest contribution a significant win for Chicago's front office. While his on-court performance remains below-average, the Bulls have secured a roster spot at essentially minimum salary levels, allowing maximum flexibility for other roster moves. This contract exemplifies smart asset management — sometimes the best deals aren't about acquiring stars, but about finding adequate production at rock-bottom prices. Richards may not be moving the needle competitively, but his deal represents textbook value optimization in an era of inflated center salaries. The one-year structure adds another layer of brilliance, giving Chicago a low-risk flyer with zero long-term commitment.
Nick Richards earns a D Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA centers this season. Through 305 games, Nick is contributing 5.8 points, 5.1 rebounds, and 0.3 assists per game in his role. Nick's strongest area is FG% at 51.2, which compares favorably to the center median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 0.3 (center median: 4.0). Among 97 NBA centers graded this season, Nick ranks 79th.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
| 0.2 |
| 0.7 |
| 51.2% |
| 27.8% |
| 64.4% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 57 | 9.3 | 8.2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 59.1% | 0.0% | 74.4% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 67 | 9.7 | 8.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 69.1% | 0.0% | 73.7% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 65 | 8.2 | 6.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 62.9% | 100.0% | 74.9% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 50 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 69.8% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 18 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 44.4% | 0.0% | 63.6% |
Nick Richards is one of the most quietly invisible players in the Eastern Conference right now, and his D+ sentiment grade reflects exactly that — not hostility, just a near-total absence of buzz on a Bulls team limping toward a 31-51 finish. The media framing around him has been defined by indifference: he arrived via trade from Phoenix as a reliable interior finisher with an elite career field goal percentage, but the coverage surrounding him reads more like a transaction log than a storyline, and a mid-season injury that kept him out briefly did nothing to elevate his profile. That narrative disconnect with his actual production is telling — in the 2025-26 season, Richards is averaging 5.8 points and 5.1 rebounds per game across 48 games, which is the output of a solid backup big man, but it has aligned uncomfortably with a D performance grade that suggests even those modest contributions haven't translated into meaningful impact on a losing roster. The Bulls' recent transactions tell the deeper story about where this organization is headed: acquiring Rob Dillingham and Leonard Miller along with four second-round picks signals a youth-and-assets rebuild, and signing a forward to a rest-of-season deal while cutting others points to roster experimentation rather than contention-building — none of which creates a flattering backdrop for a 28-year-old role player trying to carve out relevance. With the franchise clearly prioritizing future assets over present results and sentiment trending sharply downward over the past 30 days, Richards is caught in the worst possible narrative position: not bad enough to generate criticism, not good enough to generate excitement, on a team that has largely stopped caring about this season.