
#18PF · Milwaukee Bucks
Height
6'8"
Weight
221 lbs
Age
30
College
Utah
Experience
8 yrs
Wingspan
7'0.3"
Reach
8'11.5"
Hand Size
8.5" × 9.5"
Grade Kyle Kuzma
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kyle Kuzma grades out as a shaky PF for Milwaukee Bucks (D- Impact). That places him 68th of 84 graded power forwards. In his on-court role, the grade is strong (B- Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The contract is harder to defend: the Contract Value Index calls it a significant overpay (F), with the cost outrunning the output. The public read is mixed (C Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 605 | 13.1 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 49.0% | 33.5% | 72.1% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 65 | 13.1 | 4.5 | 2.6 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 65 | 13.1 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 49.0% | C C |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 5 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 34.3% | F F |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 70 | 22.2 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 46.3% | B B |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 64 | 21.2 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 44.8% | B- B- |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 66 | 17.1 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 45.2% | B B |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 6 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 29.2% | D- D- |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 21 | 10.0 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 43.0% | D- D- |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 70 | 18.7 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 45.6% | B- B- |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 77 | 16.1 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 45.0% | C+ C+ |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat, 4/11 | vs BKN | W 125-108 | 21 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3-4 | 1-1 | -8 |
| Sun, 4/5 | vs MEM | W 131-115 | 22 | 4 |
Length
2 years
Total Value
$42.8M
Guaranteed
$42.2M
AAV
$22.4M/yr
Kyle Kuzma's contract with the Milwaukee Bucks is graded as a F CVI. At $22.4M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Kyle's production is currently below the league median for power forwards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $22.4M average annual value ranks as mid-tier money for the power forward market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 30, Kyle is in his prime productive window — exactly when teams want their highest-paid players performing at their peak. The 2-year deal keeps the commitment short, giving the team financial flexibility to move on if performance drops.
Kyle Kuzma earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA power forwards this season. This season, Kyle is putting up 13.1 points, 4.5 rebounds, and 2.6 assists per game across 605 games. Kyle's strongest area is FG% at 49.0, which compares favorably to the power forward median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is APG at 2.6 (power forward median: 4.0). Among 84 NBA power forwards graded this season, Kyle ranks 68th.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the F band — a quick read on where Kyle's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kyle Kuzma ranks 68th of 84 graded power forwards by performance. That slots Kyle between Rasheer Fleming (D-) just ahead and Tolu Smith (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Rasheer FlemingPhoenix SunsD-Taylor HendricksMemphis GrizzliesD-Pete NanceMilwaukee BucksD-Graded lower
Tolu SmithDetroit PistonsNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kyle Kuzma is a veteran in his 8th NBA season listed at PF for the Milwaukee Bucks. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kyle Kuzma, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index F, Performance D-, Sentiment C.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.6 |
| 0.4 |
| 49.0% |
| 35.2% |
| 72.5% |
| 2024-25 | ![]() | 5 | 5.8 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 34.3% | 20.0% | 50.0% |
| 2023-24 | ![]() | 70 | 22.2 | 6.6 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 46.3% | 33.6% | 77.5% |
| 2022-23 | ![]() | 64 | 21.2 | 7.2 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 44.8% | 33.3% | 73.0% |
| 2021-22 | ![]() | 66 | 17.1 | 8.5 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 45.2% | 34.1% | 71.2% |
| 2020-21 | ![]() | 6 | 6.3 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 29.2% | 17.4% | 66.7% |
| 2019-20 | ![]() | 21 | 10.0 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 43.0% | 31.3% | 78.4% |
| 2018-19 | ![]() | 70 | 18.7 | 5.5 | 2.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 45.6% | 30.3% | 75.2% |
| 2017-18 | ![]() | 77 | 16.1 | 6.3 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 45.0% | 36.6% | 70.7% |
| 4 |
| 6 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 2-3 |
| 0-0 |
| -4 |
| Sat, 4/4 | vs BOS | L 101-133 | 25 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6-14 | 2-5 | -31 |
Kyle Kuzma draws a C sentiment grade as the Milwaukee Bucks narrative reflects his rotation role. The public perception has shifted sharply downward over the past month, anchored by his own public apology to fans acknowledging the team's underachievement—a high-profile mea culpa that crystallized a broader narrative of unfulfilled expectations rather than restoring confidence. Media framing paints him as a complementary piece operating at a crossroads: occasional scoring flashes (13.1 PPG across 65 games in 2025-26) remind observers he can still produce offensively, including a 20-point outing against Dallas, yet he's been ranked as low as seventh on internal roster hierarchies, signaling that both analysts and the organization view him as something less than a cornerstone at his tier of compensation. Recent team moves—notably the Bucks' midseason shuffling of the roster—underscore that management is not building the system around his contributions, a reality that has dampened media enthusiasm despite the occasional highlight moment. The dominant tone is cautious skepticism rather than outright dismissal: Kuzma remains a functional scoring threat, but the underachievement narrative and his reduced offensive role in Milwaukee's rotation have collectively eroded his standing heading into a critical offseason window. Where he lands in the broader team narrative will depend entirely on whether the Bucks can stabilize around him or whether the frustration of falling short of expectations continues to define his tenure.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.