
#7SG · Indiana Pacers
Height
6'4"
Weight
200 lbs
Age
24
College
Marquette
Draft
2025, Rd 2, #8
Experience
0 yrs
Grade Kam Jones
Your grade joins the crowd-sourced Fan Verdict.
On the field, Kam Jones grades out as a shaky SG for Indiana Pacers (D+ Impact). That places him 133rd of 147 graded shooting guards. In his on-court role, the grade is shaky (D+ Role), reflecting how he produces relative to others at his position. The money matches the play — the Contract Value Index lands at D, a slight overpay. The public read is negative (D Sentiment), drawn from current news and social signal rather than the box score. As a prospect, expect these grades to move quickly as a real sample builds.
| Year | Team | GP | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | FG% | 3PT% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Career | ![]() | 30 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 41.5% | 30.9% | 50.0% |
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 30 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.7 |
| Season | Team | GP | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | ![]() | 30 | 4.1 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 41.5% | D D |
Grades reflect the player's performance in each season. Header grade shows the current season.
| Date | OPP | Result | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3PT | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun, 4/12 | vs DET | L 121-133 | 20 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3-7 | 2-4 | -3 |
| Fri, 4/10 | vs PHI | L 94-105 | 21 | 0 |
Length
1 year
Total Value
$1.3M
Guaranteed
$3.4M
AAV
$1.3M/yr
Kam Jones's contract with the Indiana Pacers is graded as a D CVI. At $1.3M per year, the team is currently paying more than the on-court production warrants — a gap that needs to close for this deal to work out. Kam's production is currently below the league median for shooting guards, which is the main factor pulling the CVI grade down. His $1.3M average annual value ranks as minimum-level money for the shooting guard market. The concern here is the gap between production and cost — the team is paying a premium above the player's on-court value. At 24, Kam has years of development ahead, which adds significant upside to this contract. The 1-year deal limits the Indiana Pacers' downside — if the fit doesn't work, they'll have cap flexibility soon.
Kam Jones earns a D- Performance grade, indicating below-average production relative to other NBA shooting guards this season. Through 30 games, Kam is contributing 4.1 points, 1.4 rebounds, and 2.7 assists per game in his role. Kam's best relative area is FG% at 41.5, though it still falls below the shooting guard median of 46.0. The biggest area for growth is PPG at 4.1 (shooting guard median: 15.0). Among 147 NBA shooting guards graded this season, Kam ranks 133rd. At 24, Kam is still developing. The production should improve as he gains experience and a larger role with the Indiana Pacers.
Other same-position deals the Contract Value Index also places in the D band — a quick read on where Kam's contract sits relative to comparable money.
Kam Jones ranks 133rd of 147 graded shooting guards by performance. That slots Kam between Micah Peavy (D-) just ahead and Kevin McCullar Jr. (D-) just behind.
Graded higher
Micah PeavyNew Orleans PelicansD-Baylor ScheiermanBoston CelticsD-DeJon JarreauMemphis GrizzliesD-Graded lower
Kevin McCullar Jr.New York KnicksNo transactions found for this player.
Auto-moderated fan forum with 5-minute speaker turns
Loading discussion...
Kam Jones is a player on a rookie-scale contract listed at SG for the Indiana Pacers. FanVerdicts covers every NBA player, team, GM, and transaction — and puts your verdict on all of it. Sign in to cast your Fan Verdict on Kam Jones, see where the crowd lands, and argue the call. FanVerdicts also brings its own read — performance, sentiment, and Contract Value Index — as one honest input alongside the crowd's. Where FanVerdicts has weighed in so far: Contract Value Index D, Performance D-, Sentiment D.
The crowd's Fan Verdict moves in real time as fans vote on this profile. FanVerdicts' own read updates as new data lands — performance recalculates when NBA game stats post, sentiment shifts with media coverage and fan discussion, and the Contract Value Index recomputes when contract terms change. Contract details below show the structure (years, total value, average annual value, guarantees) behind the Contract Value Index read.
For league-wide context, the NBA hub has team rankings, GM report cards, the transactions feed, and live scoreboards. The NBA player rankings page sorts every active player by performance and contract value within their position.
| 0.5 |
| 0.0 |
| 41.5% |
| 30.9% |
| 50.0% |
| 4 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0-5 |
| 0-2 |
| -11 |
| Thu, 4/9 | @ BKN | W 123-94 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2-7 | 0-2 | +9 |
| Tue, 4/7 | vs MIN | L 104-124 | 23 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4-7 | 1-2 | -3 |
| Sun, 4/5 | @ CLE | L 108-117 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1-7 | 0-4 | -12 |
| Fri, 4/3 | @ CHA | L 108-129 | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 3-5 | 1-2 | -9 |
Beat coverage and fan boards are running roughly even on Kam Jones, landing him at a D sentiment grade. The narrative around the second-round rookie has fractured cleanly: on one side, Rick Carlisle's public commendation and Jones's own expressed confidence suggest the Pacers organization sees developmental potential worth nurturing; on the other, a reckless driving arrest with resisting law enforcement charges has cast a shadow over what was already a precarious roster position for a player averaging 4.1 PPG across 30 games in the 2025-26 season. The timing compounds the damage—reporting indicates the traffic stop occurred while Jones was running late to practice, a detail that raises legitimate questions about professionalism and decision-making beyond the legal offense itself. Media coverage has made clear that the off-court incident now dominates the storyline, effectively overshadowing any on-court progress Jones might demonstrate, leaving him with minimal margin for error as he fights for roster security heading into the final stretch of the season. For a fringe roster candidate already operating on a minimum-scale deal, the legal troubles have transformed what should be a straightforward developmental arc into a high-stakes character test, and the public narrative will remain skeptical until both the legal matter resolves and his basketball production justifies the organizational investment.
Peers ranked by Performance grade among players at the same position. Tap any name for their full profile.